ReadMe!!!!

Several blogs associated with the Hypergeometrical Universe Theory

The Universe Always Ring Ten Times..:)

February 25, 2017

How did I correct Newton's and Gauss' Laws

December 24, 2016

Happy Thanksgiving 2016

November 24, 2016

Happy ThanksGiving, In the past few days, I provided a rebuttal to the Helyon Peer Review.

But putting all of that aside, I will take a narrow view of the manuscript. It proposes a distance(redshift) relation, and we can quantitatively see how well this matches the data. The proper way to do this is not by making plots, it is to compute chi^2 values from the distance moduli (mu) and covariance matrix in Union2.1:  chi^2 = (mu_observed - M - mu_theory)^T . (covariance matrix^-1) . (mu_observed - M - mu_theory)  where M is a constant that can be fit (the host-mass relation can also be fit, but failing to do so won’t affect the results much). After computing chi^2 values for LambdaCDM and HU, you can see if HU is favored or disfavored by the data compared to LambdaCDM. By my eye, HU is significantly worse, but the chi^2 values will say for sure.

Second Peer Review - 2

November 22, 2016

I’m also skeptical that the luminosity of a SN Ia if G were different would scale as G^-3 (or M_ch^2).

Second Peer Review - 1

November 22, 2016

This manuscript presents the predicted luminosity distance in the Hypergeometrical Universe (HU) model and compares against the Union supernova compilation. Unfortunately, I do not believe that it is suitable for publication. I detail (only the major) issues below.

First Peer Review - 9

November 22, 2016

So overall, I am not convinced that the author has properly calculated the actual impact of the geometry of the universe that he proposes. Since he is not modifying physics in a fundamental way, but only the geometry (which is arguably the appeal of his model), many experiments in physics can be reinterpreted in terms of this new setup. As far as I can tell, they would not allow the set up to be possible. Thus unless the author can convincingly prove that the standard well known local physics is not modified in his setup, it is premature to try to calculate the impact on cosmology.

First Peer Review - 10

November 22, 2016

* Finally, I do not think it is possible for G to vary in the way that the author proposes. For one, we have constraints on the variation of G on Earth from the Oklo natural nuclear reactor and, going back further into the past, from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis which mean that if cannot have change by more than a few percent. If it were changing together with Hubble, we would find that the galaxies and orbits destabilise etc. Moreover, as the author notices, stars are very sensitive to the strength of gravity (e.g. arXiv:1102.5278) and we would have know about such variations.

First Peer Review - 8

November 22, 2016

The rest of the paper in fact makes use of some simple geometrical arguments to obtain distances and I have to admit I do not understand what they refer to. Proper null geodesics of the metric must be calculated to be able to say anything about distances.

First Peer Review - 7

November 22, 2016

* I do not understand why the author uses the standard equation for luminosity distance in LambdaCDM cosmology (calling it the "improved Hubble law"). This fundamentally assume an FRW geometry in 3 spatial dimensions, with the cosmological constant and non-relativitistic matter as the only sources of energy in the universe. If the author would like to make claims about how well supernovae fit his model, he should start with a metric and with a definition of how light propagates (e.g. on null geodesics in standard physics). Given the metric and its dynamics which one would obtain by solving Einstein equations, an equation for the luminosity distance-redshift relation can be derived. It would be different.

First Peer Review - 6

November 22, 2016

* The recent detection of gravitational waves by LIGO confirms that we understand reasonably well the generation and propagation of these waves on cosmological distances. For the reason explained above, they would also have been sensitive to the full 5D structure of the space time and therefore their luminosity would have been completely different in such a 5D setup.

First Peer Review - 5

November 22, 2016

* Even if one were to brush this off as some sort of new physics (e.g. inspired by open string theory), gravity must know about the extra dimensions. Again, we know with excellent precision that the force of gravity in the solar system falls off as 1/r^2 and therefore it is 3+1 dimensional. It is possible to have a model of gravity which is 4D at small distances but sensitive to the full 5D space at large distances (see the Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati model) but this means that the universe behaves in a completely standard way until the acceleration era. This is not what the author has in mind and comes with its own inconsistencies (ghosts etc) which have not been solved.

First Peer Review - 4

November 22, 2016

Models of this type were studied extensively in the late 90s/early 2000s under the guise of braneworlds (see e.g. the Randall-Sundrum model), but the extra dimensions were compact in order to prevent the existence of low-mass Kaluza-Klein modes. The size of this extra dimension would have to be microscopic, of the order of inverse TeV in order to avoid this problem.

First Peer Review - 3

November 22, 2016

continuation of First Peer-Review

First Peer Review -2

November 22, 2016

continuation of First Peer Review:

First Peer Review -1

November 22, 2016

Reviewer 1

HU Rebuttal Letter

November 22, 2016

Dear Dr. Rhode,

Hurray HU has a Peer-Review

November 22, 2016

Happy ThanksGiving

August 6, 2016

Happy ThanksGiving,

You don't belong!!!

July 14, 2016

How long has this been going on??? :)

July 10, 2016

How long has this been going on???  :)

No Giordano Bruno..:)

July 6, 2016

THERE IS NO GIORDANO BRUNO...:) Remind me to cross out these names as possible Giordano Brunos..:)

Discussion with Erik Anson

July 1, 2016

Discussion with Erik Anson, Let's start from the result and then digress on the painful beating I receved from this Cosmology Graduate Student, who came on a High Horse and had a Big Hat..:)

Since Inflation Theory suspends momentarily all laws of physics. Shouldn’t we seek a better model that doesn’t do that ?

July 1, 2016

Erik Anson The premise is incorrect. There’s nothing about inflation that violates the laws of physics.

Discussion with Erik Anson

July 1, 2016

I would be ungrateful if I didn't make distinction between my conversation with Erik Anson and the lack of conversation with the other scientists.

First Question to Sheldon Glashow

June 19, 2016

Dear Professor Glashow,

First Question to Paul Ginsparg

June 19, 2016

Dear Dr. Ginsparg,

Second Question to Dr Kaku

June 16, 2016

Quantum Entanglement

June 6, 2016

Quantum Entanglement It always surprises me why nobody solved the Quantum Entanglement Connundrum with this simple statement:

First Question to Kip Thorne

June 6, 2016

Dear Professor Thorne,

First Question to Max Tegmark

June 5, 2016

First Question to Lawrence M. Krauss

May 29, 2016

This is the placeholder for the first question or critique by Dr. Lawrence M. Krauss

First Question to Brian Greene

May 29, 2016

To:  bg111@columbia.edu Message body Dear Professor Brian, I created a theory and would like the opportunity to defend it and receive criticism.  A good way to do that is to present it in an academic setting. I am not a scientist anymore and since my theory has a broad scope, it requires similarly broad list of arguments to support it. The resulting paper is unyielding.  I cannot publish it piecewise due to the fact that I am not paid to do so. Despite of that, I believe that ideas are important and my idea is simple, very basic but it seems to work better in explaining the Universe than the current main scientific perspective. I reached out to many scientists and didn’t see any interest in them for championing my ideas (I just wanted to have it available in the Arxives such that people could built upon it). They didn’t seem to have any argument against the theory either. The theory challenges everything, so it is a hot potato.  That said, I hope you will give it an honest try and see if it can hold on its own.  I believe the idea will defend itself quite well and I will be happy to give a talk on it (while I remember it). I made a case for it, published the theory in a book. https://itunes.apple.com/us/book/id1116381537 You can see the case here. http://hypergeometricaluniverse.com/blog/the-case-for-the-hypergeometrical-universe/ I am looking forward to hearing from you. Thanks, MP PS.  Needless to say, I am not interested in making money by spreading ignorance - that is why I asked for criticism - preferably written criticism such that other scientists can see it and offer counter-arguments.  Anything I say has no weight since I don’t work in the field.  And words evaporate in the air… are inconsequential. My audience in that book are only a few who would be able to understand it. I believe that the theory should be seen and discussed.  

First Question to Neil deGrasse Tyson

May 29, 2016

To: @neiltyson  Message body Dear Dr. Tyson, I created a theory and would like the opportunity to defend it and receive criticism.  A good way to do that is to present it in an academic setting. I am not a scientist anymore and since my theory has a broad scope, it requires similarly broad list of arguments to support it. The resulting paper is unyielding.  I cannot publish it piecewise due to the fact that I am not paid to do that. Despite of that, I believe that ideas are important and my idea is simple, very basic but it seems to work better in explaining the Universe than the current main scientific perspective. I reached out to many scientists and didn’t see any interest in them for championing my ideas (I just wanted to have it available in the Arxives such that people could built upon it). They didn’t seem to have any argument against the theory either. The theory challenges everything, so it is a hot potato.  That said, I hope you will give it an honest try and see if it can hold on its own.  I believe the idea will defend itself quite well and I will be happy to give a talk on it (while I remember it). I made a case for it, published the theory in a book. https://itunes.apple.com/us/book/id1116381537 You can see the case here. http://hypergeometricaluniverse.com/blog/the-case-for-the-hypergeometrical-universe/ I am looking forward to hearing from you. Thanks, MP PS.  Needless to say, I am not interested in making money by spreading ignorance - that is why I asked for criticism - preferably written criticism such that other scientists can see it and offer counter-arguments.  Anything I say has no weight since I don’t work in the field.  And words evaporate in the air… are inconsequential. My audience in that book are only a few who would be able to understand it. I believe that the theory should be seen and discussed.  

First Question to Michio Kaku

May 29, 2016

The Case for the Hypergeometrical Universe

May 29, 2016

I Called Their Mothers Fat!!! by Marco Pereira on iBooks

Biot-Savart Applied to Ionic Conductors

May 28, 2016

I Called Their Mothers Fat!!! by Marco Pereira on iBooks

Precocious Supermassive Black-Holes

May 25, 2016

I called their mothers Fat!!! Day 1

May 13, 2016

I called their mothers, Fat  >:) or I beg to differ..:

I called their mothers Fat!!!!

May 11, 2016

I called their mothers, Fat  >:) THE GAUNTLET HAS BEEN THROWN!!!! You can NOW read my theory at leisure on your Kindle.  By the way, it seems I discovered a new Force in Nature...:)

Working Hard For Mankind...:)

May 9, 2016

Working Hard for Mankind!!! I have been polishing my theory for prime time.  In solving one of the puzzles that come across every time you re-read something you did 10 years ago, I stumbled in a new Force..:) 

I called their Mothers, Fat...:)

April 23, 2016

I called their Mothers, Fat...:) Not exactly, but I mentioned many times that their theories are Infinitas Complicata (http://hypergeometricaluniverse.com/blog/infinitas-complicata/) and that it was hubris to preclude the inclusion of other ideas into the discussion. 

Human Nature

April 13, 2016

There is No Blinder Man (Than The One Who Refuses to See)..:)

March 31, 2016

There is No Blinder Man (Than The One Who Refuses to See)...:) As expected, obvious errors in our current Cosmological Model would become more and more evident and data piles up. Horrendous logical mistakes like the Inflation Theory will eventually be dropped like it is Hot..:)

Second Step

March 8, 2016

First Step on Collaboration

March 6, 2016

Scripting the Hypergeometrical Standard Model I ended up finding easier to do everything in Python than in Mathematica.  Here is the initial script.  I will expand it every so often.  This script is always in Github.  Follow the collaborate link in the menu.

Where are the Aliens :)

February 28, 2016

This subject has a curious history.  It never states the obvious.  Most likely any encounter with an Alien Civilization would take place through their Robotic Explorers - not unlike our own case.   If there were any life form in Mars or Europa - they would had meet our robotic devices.

The Placebo Effect

February 28, 2016

The "belief' of the importance or relevance of a placebo effect always bothered me in the same way as the power of prayer.  I've never worked on clinical trials statistics so I was never privy to data from double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCT).  Someone in the DC's Improbable Science did a great article on the subject.  

The Riemann Hypothesis and the Hypergeometrical Universe - Review

February 26, 2016

Riemann Hypothesis and The Hypergeometrical Universe   We are jump starting this blog to finish up the calculations of the hyperon family and isotopes. This is reproduced here just to jog your memory...:) Our love for knowledge and beauty has always driven us to find the most sublime analogies to represent what we are seeing in the Universe. Einstein wanted to read God's Mind. The Hypothetical Higgs Boson has been named by some as the God Particle. I equated the steps of my Lightspeed Expanding Hyperspherical Universe as being somewhat similar to the Pendulum of Brahma. At each cycle we see ourselves changed by that Universal Operator. Mathematics is always the Golden Standard of beauty. We always hope to find a nicely fitting mathematical equation to describe the whole Universe. Mathematicians (String Theorists) are especially hopeful..:). Of course, after all, that would be redemption to their endeavor of creating the least physical (most mathematical) theory in history. Euler's Beta Function relationship to the Strong Force model was immediately recognized as the sign we are on the right track, after all, for a theory to be correct it has to be aesthetically beautiful….:) Form over content…very typical of our Mankind always driven by superficial calculations….:) It just happens that there isn't any indication that physics doesn't matter, that is, there isn't any indication that at the end of all, we will have everything described by a simple mathematical equations that overrules all physical properties. For example, there is the wave equation which describes all waves as long as they have a natural velocity or one knows the elasticity of the medium where those waves propagate. This means that even though we have the knowledge of an equation which would describe such a general phenomena as waves, the physics is still there in the form of a pesky constant.. :) This does not demerit the scientists who found those beautiful equations, it just serves as a reminder that there might be a limit on what mathematical abstraction can achieve. It has been said with some understated deepness that the Riemann Hypothesis might be the solution to the Theory of Everything, that is, something, some force, some string might be represented somehow by the zeros of the Zeta function along the critical line. The details are fuzzy since this is just a wild (albeit educated..:)  guess...:) Scientists look down to Horoscopists all their lives…:)  It is well know that vague statements can always find resonance within some fraction of the population and thus keep the readers happy and aware of their daily best options…:) One might say that the same happens in Science. There is a difference. Since we are a much more educated bunch than the average person, our guesses are better educated..:) that is, there is something deep in the number theory applied to Primes..:) Of course, this is just because people doesn't know how to think about numbers and one should expect that if the zeros of an equation are related to primes, most likely the logic behind the construction of the equation is such that primes will be part of the equation zeros..:) It is like being surprised that f(x)=(x-1)*(x-2) has zeros equal to 1 and 2. Number theory is just not developed enough to see the underlying logic behind the Riemann Hypothesis and the Zeta Function (or Eta Function on the Analytic Continuation). As usual, the statement that the Riemann Hypothesis should be relevant to our understanding of the Universe can be decomposed into the simpler statement that Primes will be relevant..:) I am a simple minded man, so I will cut to the chase and explore this proposition..:) Nobody bothered to think about Primes because nothing in Physics looks like Primes. If a poor string theorist looks around and think about making Primes to be some property of strings them we might end up with 10^500000000000000 possible Universes with different string theories explaining each one of them..:) A Standard Model Physicist is not in much better position. Let say that zero are electromagnetic waves, the ONE is…J The next basic particles are electron and Proton … Neutron might be TWO but that does not solve the problem. Electrons and Protons are certainly not equal in the Standard Model and the analogy dies there…:) Of course, that is not the case in the Hypergeometrical Universe!!!! :) ARE FERMION PARTICLES PRIMES YES.  I decided to add ONE to the prime sequence just as a rebellious guy I am..:) In my theory one can easily relate ZERO to the dilaton field and its spatial modulation (electromagnetic waves). ONE is clearly the Fundamental Dilator which represents all four fundamental particles (Electron, Proton, AntiElectron, AntiProton). TWO is of course the Neutron THREE are the Pions FIVE are the CRAZY DELTAS SEVEN are the KAONS ELEVEN are the XIS Star – This Channel decays into a KaonZero and a Pion Minus. THIRTEEN are the LUCKY OMEGAS ARE Neutral Majorama PARTICLES 2^N NUMBERS YES. I am sure the numerologists will have a field day..:) As in any good Horoscope, there is a caveat. There are exclusions to the Prime Rule. They are associated with another nice mathematical formula, the formula for 2 to the power of another number. (2,4,8,16…) TWO is the precursor to a Gamma photon from the annihilation of a Positron-Electron pair. FOUR is the Pion Zero EIGTH is the KAON ZERO Later, I will show how the mathematical space topology and mathematical instrumentation needed to solve the Riemann Hypothesis also describes the mass of the Hyperons…:) A hint. Look at the Fundamental Dilator coherence 'energy' diagram. The degenerated states on the two potential wells lose their degeneration due to the finite velocity of light, which creates a time delay for a spatial rotation within the 3D Lightspeed Expanding Hypersphere. Think about what does it means to be real…:) and read the Meaning of Material Existence blog I wrote in the past. ARE THERE Neutral PARTICLES = 2*N NUMBERSAs in any good Horoscope, there is always something for everyone. It just happens that 2N is also a valid mapping for Neutral Particles.Of course, since they decompose into opposite charged particles, they have to be the SUM OF TWO PRIMES (Goldbach's Conjecture) or 2 Majorama Particles…:)SIX is the DELTA ZERONow that you know the answer to the question, it should be easier to derive the equation that describes the process...:) I wrote a book called The Flying Orchestra, which represents our journey through the Universe inside the Ligthspeed Expanding Hyperspherical Universe. Most of us :) are composed of isotopes, which turned out to be quite harmonious dimensional notes. The Hyperons are the basic notes of our Universe, that is, the most unique, cacophonous notes one can create- like Heavy Metal...:)In comparison, the isotopes are like Mozart Symphonies...NAH....in fact, they are quite boring and more like Kenny GIn the next few blogs, I will address the isotopes, the mass equation (or God Equation if you so prefer :) .I am awaiting for Steven Chu to say something before I write about how to make a neutral particle accelerator or anything accelerator or dimensional accelerator...:)Cheers,MP

Did the Universe came from Nothing?

November 7, 2015

Did the Universe came from Nothing?Where is God's Hand in the Universe Creation...:) For as long as there was people and before people for as long as there was Dinosaurs..:) , there were people exploiting people by claiming to speak God's Word.This is an interesting debate about Religion: Does God Exist? (Frank Turek vs Christopher Hitchens) It is interesting but it pains me that Christopher Hitchens doesn't have my simple explanation to rebut the question about Everything from Nothing.The question about Morality coming from molecules.  There is no reason to consider that morality (compassion, family ties, sense of mortality etc) doesn't have a biological (chemical) basis.   Elephants, dogs, etc show compassion, love or emotional attachment, self-sacrifice etcThose characteristics can be naturally selected since they relate to societal (group) life.  Groups are stronger than lonely individuals.  I have no doubt that a large fraction of being Good and being Evil (psychopath) is biological.  So I think that Hitchens could have a clearer position against Turek argument that Morality is Divine.   If Divine means qualities that are naturally better selectable, then Morality is Divine in the same way as Gravitation/Electromagnetism is Divine.It is just an Antropic Label...  Natural selection will not select a bunch of selfish psychopaths facing the Glacial Age (for instance) or facing competition for food and being food in a Primordial Forest. Natural selection will favor collaborative, loving people instead, so Natural Selection supports Morality.The only salient point of Turek's position is if there is an interventionist God.  All the other arguments are trivially rebuttable. He didn't try to prove that.That said, the discussion is pleasant to listen to  and I highly recommend it.Cheers,MP

Do we live in a 3D Hypersurface...:)

November 7, 2015

Do we live in a  3D Hypersurface?How would we know about it?  We can see the three dimensions.  The surface aspect would come into play if those three dimensions were embedded into some extra dimension.If there was something outside that Hypersurface, we would see it in the same way, a Soccer ball left under the hot Sun, would feel its heat.That heat would be diffuse and since no direction within a 3D spatial manifold could be used to point to the actual source.Luckily, we don't see that happening, which means we are not in a collision path onto another part of this Universe (4D spatial manifold).So, it would seem that a fourth dimension would be unknowable..:) Einstein proposed that time is relative (time flow).  That sound like a great sound bite...:) and clearly incorrect since we all describe the beginning of times to be around some 14 Billion years ago.  So there is something timing the Universe expansion and that somehow always flow in the same way no matter where you are in the Universe.The timing of the Universe expansion is mapped into the Cosmological Time in my theory.  The fourth dimensional radius of the Universe is related to it by the observed speed of light.  The fourth dimensional radius of the Universe is C (observed speed of light) times Omega (Cosmological Time).In my theory, the actual speed of light is SQRT(2) C...:) since in my theory our reference frame is a lightspeed traveling reference framework.Other Hypergeometrical UniversesIn my theory, numbers and Number Theory plays a strong role, albeit accidental.  I am not a Numerologist..;) Primes felt on my lap when I started my assignment of Hyperons.Primes also appears in my reference to a Number Universe where the volume of each Number is always a product of vectors along Prime directions.  This view of a Number Universe has a reflection on the Hypergeometrical Universe Cosmogenesis.Remember that the Cosmogenesis started in Zero Dimensional Fluctuations (0 = 1-1= 2-2=7-7 etc).Fluctuations of Zero Dimensions could be followed by One Dimension Fluctuation through a Dimensional Transition.The next step is Two-Dimension embedded into 3D, Three-Dimension into 4D...Remember that the Origin of the Universe is the decay of the Fundamental Fluctuation into a myriad of small fluctuations. Enthropy creates the barrier to the recombination into Oblivion.  The question is how entropy barrier depends upon dimensionality.  I am not going to dwell on that issue right now, but entropy increases with dimensionality (higher number of possible states), thus it is necessary a minimum level of Dimensionality Migration to create a long lasting Universe.At this point we can define an Anthropic argument that our 3D Hypersurface (lightspeed expanding due to the partial recombination of the initial fluctuation) would would live long enough for us to exist... no mentioning of the precise value of the Gravitational constant, etc... just an Antropic argument based upon dimensionality dependent entropic volume implied a sizable residual Universe after initial recombination.The next great question is if Primes controls the dimensionality of Universes... :)  I would be my house (I live in an apartment..:).It is an appealing concept. I will make it MP Conjecture..such that my name is attach to it..:)

Unnecessarily Constrained

April 17, 2015

Unnecessarily Constrained..:)Little by little this theory is gaining some track.  It is a humble, simple theory of everything..:)

Broken Link to Main Paper

December 2, 2014

Broken Link to Main Paper Restored

Milk Way Monster Black Hole Ignores Snack

November 21, 2014

From Dust it Comes ... To Dust it Returns..:)

October 8, 2014

A 3.5 Factor, Hyperluminous Neutrinos and Infinitely Fast Processes

August 1, 2014

A 3.5 Factor, Hyperluminous Neutrinos and Infinitely Fast ProcessesFirst let's talk about a 3.5 factor in my theory.  When developing the theory, I as everybody else, took clues from reality.  A theory has to be self-consistent and consistent with reality.  I realized that deriving the theory just by looking at cross-sections of an light-speed expanding hypersphere wasn't in line with the standard way of thinking.  One normally thinks about a force, being communicated through space and distance... so the field will naturally be diluted by the area though which it is diffusing..:)

The ABC Conjecture, The InterUniversal Geometry and the Hyperon Family

December 8, 2013

The ABC Conjecture, The Hypergeometrical Universe and The InterUniversal Geometry

The Importance of Physics!

February 15, 2013

The Whole Universe and a Grain of Sand

February 3, 2013

The Stroboscopic Universe Questions

January 10, 2013

ARE Neutral Majorama PARTICLES 2^N NUMBERS

October 17, 2012

Protons, Electrons, Antiprotons, Positrons and Neutrons

October 17, 2012

THE PIONS

October 17, 2012

THE CRAZY DELTAS

October 17, 2012

Riemann Hypothesis: Are all Spin Half Hyperons Primes? YES.   FIVE are the CRAZY DELTAS

THE XIS Star

October 17, 2012

THE KAONS

October 17, 2012

THE LUCKY OMEGAS

October 17, 2012

Riemann Hypothesis: Are all Spin Half Hyperons Primes? YES. THIRTEEN are the LUCKY OMEGAS (below are two decay channels)

Under the Night Sky

October 8, 2012

New Book

September 27, 2012

HurrayThe theory has been published in a new book:

The ABC Conjecture

September 18, 2012

The ABC Conjecture and The Hypergeometrical UniverseThe abc conjecture (also known as Oesterlé–Masser conjecture) is a conjecture in number theory, first proposed by Joseph Oesterlé (1988) and David Masser (1985) as an integer analogue of the Mason–Stothers theorem for polynomials. The conjecture is stated in terms of three positive integers, a, b and c (whence comes the name), which have no common factor and satisfy a + b = c. If d denotes the product of the distinct prime factors of abc, the conjecture essentially states that d is rarely much smaller than c.What could the identity

Request for Criticism...:)

June 20, 2012

Request for Criticism

New and nice features

June 16, 2012

Please sign in and support this blog...:)

Hyperluminal Neutrinos..:)

September 25, 2011

Hyperluminal Neutrinos

A Simple Theory of The Mind

August 23, 2011

Some 12 years ago, I was thinking about life and came up with some understanding of how the Mind works... Not how it is organized anatomically...:) I didn't have access to free floating brains...:) but how a human personality is created and maintained.

Quantum Gravity

June 27, 2011

The Flu

January 22, 2011

AS FAT AS YOU WILL EVER GET

October 28, 2010

 AS FAT AS YOU WILL EVER GET

Answers to Questions

July 27, 2010

Matter-Antimatter Ratio Comment

May 25, 2010

Matter-AntiMatter Anihilation Comment

May 25, 2010

Comment On The Beginning of Times

May 16, 2010

Anjan posted "The Beginning of Times":

An Ancient Flower Bloom...:)

May 2, 2010

An Ancient Flower Bloom...:)   There are many things still to be blogged, but many things are already presented.  I know that circa 40 thousand readers (scientists or otherwise) have been to this site.  A few left questions which I always tried to answer.This is a free flowing blog, the historical documentation of an idea.   I am quite glad with the final product and know that many things changed (a little) from the beginning.  At the beginning my Fundamental Dilator had five phases and was red and yellow..:) later became four-phased and green and yellow.  Red doesn't print properly on black and while printer.  The fifth phase was a return to the original phase so I decided to eclipse it.  The five phased coherence might be a better description.  People will eventually decide, if this theory takes hold.I realized that the actual speed of light is sqrt(2) times the observed speed of light. This shouldn't change the fundamental equations (Law and Gravitation) since they are close action at distance equations (even a million light years is just a very small fraction of a 15.36 billion years.  The correction are even less relevant since the action at very far distance (billion of light years) will not just decay with the inverse squared distance...:)  The exact law can be easily derived from the Pioneer Anomaly diagrams.  But that seems to be irrelevant since most interaction takes place within a few million light years...(intergalactic distance).Equations might have to be changed to adapt to this new insight, but that doesn't change anything in the short distance laws..:) (up to a billion light years)..I don't think we are under the gravitational or electrostatic pull of anything one billion light years away..:) it is just way too far... The calculated frequency of Gravitational Waves will change by a factor equal to the inverse of the quartic root of two...:)  This changes are the result of the actual speed of light being sqrt(2) times the observed speed of light.  The substitution of R0 by sqrt(2)R0 all over the place should solve the problem.Next weekend, I will update my paper which is lagging behind the blog these days. There are things that I haven 't said.  I've just don't have the time..:) but maybe someone will ask me a specific question..:) I always answer my readers..:)In the meantime, enjoy some great music...:)Cheers,MP

The 7th Vigier Symposium at the Imperial College, London UK

May 2, 2010

The Beginning of Times

April 27, 2010

Darn Retarded Potentials and the Beginning of Times…:)

April 23, 2010

Hubble Expansion and the Hypergeometrical Universe

April 4, 2010

Puzzled Reader

January 30, 2010

Anonymous said:It looks like the old school code I learned in 4th grade, but made nosense- I got "RESVSQFVHLCEDP". So unless I try loading the alphabet into it backwards and having it mean something, ya got me.   MP said...I gave all the clues...:) Please go to a Bookstore and read a little of "The Lost Symbol" by Dan Brown (no - I don't get a cent for plugging his book, I just enjoyed reading it..:) I hope you liked my other analogies. I especially enjoyed creating the analogy of the Rosicrucian Rose symbolism with a Hypergeometrical Universe topology...:) Cheers, MP New theory proposed that the 3-D Universe is a shock wave traveling at the speed of light along a fourth-dimension.

The Proton Spin Crisis

January 30, 2010

 The Solution to the Proton Spin Crisis

Verbum Significatium

December 30, 2009

Verbum SignificatiumIt is no Ancient Secret that I enjoyed reading Dan Brown's Angels and Deamons. I rarely read fiction but I was smitten by the subject - a scientific plot within the surroundings of Castelo di Sant'Angelo.Many of my previous blogs contain references to the Illuminati...:) an humorous take on the Wisdom of the Ancients. I am not someone who believes in the Wisdom of the Ancients, although considering how simple my theory is, it wouldn't surprise me if Ancient Wise people had a glimpse of it. Knowledge doesn't evolve in straight lines - over long periods of time. This statement looks odd if considered within our short-lived technological framework where new technologies are derived from previous ones. The statement becomes meaningful if one add a longer time frame. Our technology/science will develop in short straight lines with bottlenecks. At these instances, noise will take over until a breakthrough coming from nowhere will make itself felt.This is where my theory fits in. To a high degree my theory could had been discovered by ancients. I mentioned in several postings similarities between my intermittently interacting Universe and Diana, the Goddess-Huntress seeking knowledge in the forest of Silva.

Comment on Riemann Hypothesis and The Hypergeometrical Universe

December 19, 2009

Comment on Does God Play Dice

December 11, 2009

Riemann Hypothesis and The Hypergeometrical Universe

November 22, 2009

Riemann Hypothesis and The Hypergeometrical Universe   Our love for knowledge and beauty has always driven us to find the most sublime analogies to represent what we are seeing in the Universe. Einstein wanted to read God's Mind. The Hypothetical Higgs Boson has been named by some as the God Particle. I equated the steps of my Lightspeed Expanding Hyperspherical Universe as being somewhat similar to the Pendulum of Brahma. At each cycle we see ourselves changed by that Universal Operator. Mathematics is always the Golden Standard of beauty. We always hope to find a nicely fitting mathematical equation to describe the whole Universe. Mathematicians (String Theorists) are especially hopeful..:). Of course, after all, that would be redemption to their endeavor of creating the least physical (most mathematical) theory in history. Euler's Beta Function relationship to the Strong Force model was immediately recognized as the sign we are on the right track, after all, for a theory to be correct it has to be aesthetically beautiful….:) Form over content…very typical of our Mankind always driven by superficial calculations….:) It just happens that there isn't any indication that physics doesn't matter, that is, there isn't any indication that at the end of all, we will have everything described by a simple mathematical equations that overrules all physical properties. For example, there is the wave equation which describes all waves as long as they have a natural velocity or one knows the elasticity of the medium where those waves propagate. This means that even though we have the knowledge of an equation which would describe such a general phenomena as waves, the physics is still there in the form of a pesky constant.. :) This does not demerit the scientists who found those beautiful equations, it just serves as a reminder that there might be a limit on what mathematical abstraction can achieve. It has been said with some understated deepness that the Riemann Hypothesis might be the solution to the Theory of Everything, that is, something, some force, some string might be represented somehow by the zeros of the Zeta function along the critical line. The details are fuzzy since this is just a wild (albeit educated..:)  guess...:) Scientists look down to Horoscopists all their lives…:)  It is well know that vague statements can always find resonance within some fraction of the population and thus keep the readers happy and aware of their daily best options…:) One might say that the same happens in Science. There is a difference. Since we are a much more educated bunch than the average person, our guesses are better educated..:) that is, there is something deep in the number theory applied to Primes..:) Of course, this is just because people doesn't know how to think about numbers and one should expect that if the zeros of an equation are primes, most likely the logic behind the construction of the equation is such that only certain primes will be zeros..:) It is like being surprised that f(x)=(x-1)*(x-2) has zeros equal to 1 and 2. Number theory is just not developed enough to see the underlying logic behind the Riemann Hypothesis and the Zeta Function (or Eta Function on the Analytic Continuation). As usual, the statement that the Riemann Hypothesis should be relevant to our understanding of the Universe can be decomposed into the simpler statement that Primes will be relevant..:) I am a simple minded man, so I will cut to the chase and explore this proposition..:) Nobody bothered to think about Primes because nothing in Physics looks like Primes. If a poor string theorist looks around and think about making Primes to be some property of strings them we might end up with 10^500000000000000 possible Universes with different string theories explaining each one of them..:) A Standard Model Physicist is not in much better position. Let say that zero are electromagnetic waves, the ONE is…J The next basic particles are electron and Proton … Neutron might be TWO but that does not solve the problem. Electrons and Protons are certainly not equal in the Standard Model and the analogy dies there…:) Of course, that is not the case in the Hypergeometrical Universe. ARE FERMION PARTICLES PRIMES YES.  I decided to add ONE to the prime sequence just as a rebellious guy I am..:) In my theory one can easily relate ZERO to the dilaton field and its spatial modulation (electromagnetic waves). ONE is clearly the Fundamental Dilator which represents all four fundamental particles (Electron, Proton, AntiElectron, AntiProton). TWO is of course the Neutron THREE are the Pions FIVE are the CRAZY DELTAS SEVEN are the KAONS ELEVEN are the XIS Star – This Channel decays into a KaonZero and a Pion Minus. THIRTEEN are the LUCKY OMEGAS ARE Neutral Majorama PARTICLES 2^N NUMBERS YES. I am sure the numerologists will have a field day..:) As in any good Horoscope, there is a caveat. There are exclusions to the Prime Rule. They are associated with another nice mathematical formula, the formula for 2 to the power of another number. (2,4,8,16…) TWO is the precursor to a Gamma photon from the annihilation of a Positron-Electron pair. FOUR is the Pion Zero EIGTH is the KAON ZERO Later, I will show how the mathematical space topology and mathematical instrumentation needed to solve the Riemann Hypothesis also describes the mass of the Hyperons…:) A hint. Look at the Fundamental Dilator coherence 'energy' diagram. The degenerated states on the two potential wells lose their degeneration due to the finite velocity of light, which creates a time delay for a spatial rotation within the 3D Lightspeed Expanding Hypersphere. Think about what does it means to be real…:) and read the Meaning of Material Existence blog I wrote in the past. ARE THERE Neutral PARTICLES = 2*N NUMBERSAs in any good Horoscope, there is always something for everyone. It just happens that 2N is also a valid mapping for Neutral Particles.Of course, since they decompose into opposite charged particles, they have to be the SUM OF TWO PRIMES (Goldbach's Conjecture) or 2 Majorama Particles…:)SIX is the DELTA ZERONow that you know the answer to the question, it should be easier to derive the equation that describes the process...:) I wrote a book called The Flying Orchestra, which represents our journey through the Universe inside the Ligthspeed Expanding Hyperspherical Universe. Most of us :) are composed of isotopes, which turned out to be quite harmonious dimensional notes. The Hyperons are the basic notes of our Universe, that is, the most unique, cacophonous notes one can create- like Heavy Metal...:)In comparison, the isotopes are like Mozart Symphonies...NAH....in fact, they are quite boring and more like Kenny GIn the next few blogs, I will address the isotopes, the mass equation (or God Equation if you so prefer :) .I am awaiting for Steven Chu to say something before I write about how to make a neutral particle accelerator or anything accelerator or dimensional accelerator...:)Cheers,MP

Listen Dr Fate's Music...:) I love it...:)

November 15, 2009

Comment on the Mercury Perihelion Solution

November 8, 2009

Comment on Dr. Steven Chu's Letter

September 29, 2009

The Luddites are coming..:)

August 27, 2009

Letter to Dr. Steven Chu

August 15, 2009

Hunger

August 6, 2009

May the Force be with You, Not

July 21, 2009

SuperStrings

July 14, 2009

SuperStringsFirst I have to say that the research in SuperStrings or any other tremendously mathematical theory is valuable and has been set forth by brilliant minds. In addition, the theories might really being brought back from the 23rd Century and be totally correct.Secondly, I have to say something that might help you see other perspectives with an open mind.Here is what I have to say:There is a bothering aspect in the present search for the theory of everything.There are precepts on how the theory should look like.Unseeming comments like the claim that String Theory is a theory from the 23rd Century (thus should be correct) are not scientific. It delegates all otherattempts to second best just by using that empty statement.I see the big picture although I might fail to see the details. The big picture is that superstrings are supposed to replicate energy levels (mass) of particles and the different types of bosons that convey the so called Forces. The problem is that SuperSring boundary conditions create evenly spaced energy levels (the length of the string is a multiple of the wavelength associated with an specific state). All the contortions of creation of Tori, folding the space in membranes etc are used to try to compresses those strings into submission to yield the observed particles and bosons.The fact that the superstring is supposed to be extremely small means that there will be a lot of trouble to make matter out of them (to find states that are low enough to accommodate the observed particles' masses).

The W-Minus Particle

June 14, 2009

The Hypergeometrical Y(4140) and Particle J

May 2, 2009

New Particle Baffles Scientists...:)

April 8, 2009

How to subscribe to the Hypergeometrical Universe

February 15, 2009

How to subscribe to the Hypergeometrical Universe

Energy Conservation and the Fundamental Dilator

December 29, 2008

The Hypergeometrical Force

December 17, 2008

The Hypergeometrical ForceWhen I DERIVED the equation for the Hypergeometrical Force – the Grand Unification Force - used a setup with two infinitesimal elements of current (or mass flow).These infinitesimal elements of current or flow defined a direction within the four dimensional spatial manifold. This direction is shown as velocities in the formulas. Despite of having velocities, these formulas were derived for constant velocities, where the velocities were referred from a relaxed Fabric of Space reference system. To eliminate this constraint one has to derived the potential through adiabatic integration followed by the derivation of a generalized force according to Lagrangian formalism!!!These means that the force equations below are constant velocity forces. Despite of this constraint, they are quite usefull for making simplied reasonings about dynamics.Here are the equations for Electromagnetism and Gravitation: (1)Where C1 and C2 are the charges traveling at V1 and V2 and c is the speed of light. R12 is a vector from charge 1 to charge 2.Similarly for Gravitation: Notice that the only difference is the proportionality coefficient. This means that the interaction is the same – dilaton field-dilator interaction controlled by the Quantum Lagrangian Principle. The proportionality coefficient ratio is given by the ratio of these two angles a0 and a1:R0 is the age of the Universe times the speed of light (15.82 billion light years) and λ1 is the Compton wavelength of a Hydrogen atom. To be precise, this ratio has to be multiplied by an elastic coefficient of the Fabric of Space. This coefficient is the reason why dilaton and Gravitational waves exist.The humongous (1036) factor is easy to understand by this simple figure. A more detailed analysis can be found in the pdf containing the theory.This equation can be simplified for the case where there is no rotation and one of the bodies is much larger than the other (Sun and Mercury for instance) into:This is the first time a force is actually derived from a purely geometrical theory of the Universe, so it took me some time to understand that this equation has to be integrated upon R (distance) to yield the amount of energy that can be shared into Kinetic and Potential at any position.Adiabatic integration upon R yields the potential (3)This potential is the one used in the Precession of Mercury's Perihelion problem. Applying it to Lagrangian Formalism yields the more appropriate force formula for physical bodies or charges:Similarly for F one obtains:Thus F becomes:Expanding it in powers of Neglecting terms above the second orderThis means that my Gravitational Force does not contains first order dependence upon v/c and also that it perfectly describes all celestial dynamics. It produces the same formula for the Precession of Mercury or Earth or anything else Perihelion…JIn summary, my formula produces not one but TWO formulas for force. One for constructs that cannot change speed (e.g. Light) and another for bodies. They are reproduced without approximations below:The second formula is used to derive the Gravitational Lensinng (Gerber failed to do so since he only ansatz (guessed) right the first formula).The more complex formulation for the Force per unit mass (for double jets Black Holes or White Orifices) is given by:To understand the rest of the Universe, one only need to add the Fundamental Dilator paradigm.The Fundamental Dilator is a coherence between two deformation states within the 4D spatial manifold. The orientation of the letters in the figure below maps the orientation of the dilator deformation with respect to our 3D Hypersurface. A vertical lettering means that the dilator overlaps minimally with our 3DUniverse (the Fundamental Dilator is quite flat (along the fourth dimension).The Fundamental Dilator can be represented by this diagram:

Mercury's Perihelion Prequel

December 15, 2008

Inflation Theory and Energy Conservation

December 5, 2008

Inflation Theory and Energy Conservation

The Hubble Expansion Paradigm

December 3, 2008

HAPPY THANKSGIVING...:)

November 26, 2008

Viva Obama...:)

November 5, 2008

Letters from Vic

November 2, 2008

Letters from a friend.

V/C Origin

November 1, 2008

Hypergeometrical Universe vs General Relativity

October 28, 2008

Hypergeometrical Gravitational Lensing

October 28, 2008

Hypergeometrical Gravitational Lensing

The Precession of Mercury's Perihelion

October 26, 2008

The Sam Wormley Challenge

October 22, 2008

White Orifice Propelled Galaxy

October 19, 2008

Vacuous Criticism

October 18, 2008

Vacuous Criticism

Galaxy Rotation Curve

October 18, 2008

The White Orifice on the Black Hole...:)

October 16, 2008

On The Sphere II

October 13, 2008

On The Sphere I

October 13, 2008

On The Sphere I

Spin

October 12, 2008

Gravitational Fundamental Dilator or 1+1=1.004145342

October 9, 2008

Gravitational Fundamental Dilator or 1+1=1.004145342In this blog, I prove that 1+1 is not always 2. I am sure that will be used by some to prove that I cannot count... or as a proof of Godel's theorem..:) In fact, on those times where something unexpected occurs, the physics behind an identity failure is surprisingly interesting. When one creates a Gravitational Fundamental Dilator, one adds two Fundamental Dilators (a Proton plus an Electron) such that the ensemble spin is zero. The creation a spin zero dilator is not unlike the creation of a hydrogen atom.

Positivism

October 2, 2008

Positivism

Does God Play Dice

September 28, 2008

Does God Play Dice in a Classical Sense...:)

Hypergeometrical Electromagnetism and Gravitation

September 28, 2008

Hypergeometrical Electromagnetism and Gravitation

Footprints in the Forest of Matter

September 27, 2008

The Pioneer Anomaly

September 24, 2008

The Pioneer Anomaly

Gyrogravity and Antigravity

September 18, 2008

Gyrogravitation and AntiGravity

Pion Glutonic States

September 16, 2008

Pion Glutonic States

The Image in the Mirror

September 13, 2008

http://www.hypergeometricaluniverse.com

August 16, 2008

http://www.hypergeometricaluniverse.com

Pion Decay along Path Two

August 13, 2008

Pion Decay along Path TwoThe prior assignment for Muon Minus in my theory was given by:

Pion Decay along Path One

August 13, 2008

Pion Decay along Path One The Introduction of Glutonic States of Matter...;)We hear everyday the the world is getting fatter...:) especially the people here in the US...:) It just happens that the Universe always had little Glutons... or at least Glutonic States..>:)

Something about Pions...:)

August 9, 2008

The miniBooNE ExperimentIf I had a Pion for every time I corrected Science I would be a very rich man...:)The miniBooNE experiment was created to confirm the Neutrino Oscillatory Model, that is, it was designed to see neutrinos metamorphose themselves as a function of distance traversed from point they were created.

The Silence of the Lambs

August 3, 2008

The Silence of The Lambs..:)This blog is about to reach its 20,000 unique IP readers...:) Hurray!!!!I didn't know there were so many cosmologists, string theorists, particle physicists in the planet...:)There are many reasons to celebrate...The theory has been published in two books:

Conservation Hypergeometrical Laws

July 28, 2008

Conservation Hypergeometrical Laws

The Solar Neutrino Puzzle

July 27, 2008

The Solar Neutrino Puzzle

Sterile Neutrinos

July 24, 2008

Sterile NeutrinosThese neutrinos were hypothesized to exist and to be able to interact only through Gravitation. If they were real in any shape or form they would had modulated the development of the Universe.Of course, they are also the reason behind weapons race associated with The Final Theory..:)Currently, Science has the myopic view (4D Spacetime) which allows for incongruous reasonings like a circular spacetime (due to mass induced Spacetime curvature) etc. In this very primitive perception of the Universe, the existence of a new gravitationally interacting particle would change the effective gravitational mass distributed within the 3D Universe and that could induce the Universe to be a Big Bang to be followed by a Big Crunch etc...Of course, this is meaningless and brainless in a 5DSpacetime with a 3D Shockwave Hyperspherical Universe paradigm.In any event, I showed that the Electron Neutrino was associated with the 3D Rotation of the Proton-side deformation. Below is the Neutron deformation spinning double potential well: This figure shows three coherences. The first is the Neutron coherence. Here an electron coherence is followed by a Electron-Proton Transmutation chord. This chord corresponds to a sub-coherence between states (2/3,2/3,-1/3) and (2/3,-1/3,2/3) or to a rotation around the X-axis. This occurs while the spinning perpendicular to R takes place and changes which state will be in phase with the 3D Hypersphere (our 3D Universe). It changes the in-phase phase from Electron to Proton. Later another Electron-Proton Transmutation Chord restores the Electron phase as the in-phase one.Since there is no difference between starting from one phase or the other, the Neutron is actually represented by the two possible coherences, thus a dimer. As a dimer it has helicity, nuclear angular momentum and spin...:)

GEONS

July 20, 2008

GEONS

The Holographic Principle

July 20, 2008

The Holographic Principle

Einheitliche Fieldtheorie

July 20, 2008

Einheitliche Fieldtheorie

Sir Isaac Newton - The Alchemist

June 14, 2008

Sir Isaac Newton - The AlchemistSir Isaac Newton introduced the concept of Gravitation as a pervasive force controlling the motion of all Celestial and Earth bound objects. Later in life, Newton redirected his attention to Alchemy.At his time, it was easy to think that the Ancients- who had such a rich culture - had many of their teachings lost in the night of times (Dark Ages) ... and they were.... until the Renaissance... I am sure many of their achievements are still not fully recovered.Newton realized that there is such a thing as Action-At-Distance (in the proper relativistic obeying physical sense). It turned out that there is only action at distance, nothing else. Even when two surfaces are in contact, there is a distance between the layers of atoms that comprise those surfaces.Newton correctly understood that there should be a framework of waves guiding everything that happens in this Universe. He looked into the hairlike growth of crystals in solution and envisioned a field guiding the positioning of each atom or piece of matter...:)He was very close to understanding the whole Universe. The only missing element was the fourth spatial dimension and the understanding of how fine was the framework.In my theory, I proposed that this framework is a mesh of dilatons with a four-dimensional wavelength equal to the Compton wavelength of a Fundamental Dilator (a Hydrogen atom)...:)In the derivation of my Grand Unification equations I used the dilator and the dilaton field created by it as a single entity. This is because a dilator surfs its own dilaton field as it creates it or the local dilaton field if it is interaction with other dilators. Of course, the dilaton field extends aways even in our 3D spatial hypersphere as it is created and has its own existence.The 4DSpacetime projection of the 5D Spacetime dilaton field is the de Broglie wave associated with the particle.This means that the de Broglie waves are not just an artifact nor are they matter waves in the current sense. Dilators (matter) still are localized within the de Broglie wavefront. The difference is that given a mechanism for de Broglie wave interference, the matter (dilators) will follow trajectories that reflect the interference pattern. Given enough dilators, the complete resulting interference deposition pattern will occur.The dilator free dilaton field (matter free metric) will contain all the oscillating metric deformations in accordance to my Grand Unification Equation - the equation for the dilaton field resulting from a group of dilators.As you know, one can only guess what Newton was trying to see when he recreated crystal growth in solution. Those experiments yield interesting and well defined structures which are the result of atomic interaction...I imagined the curious Newton trying to see them as the result an Action-At-Distance force. In the Hypergeometrical Universe language, he would be trying to see the effect of a dilaton field.Since the dilaton field is simple to understand in a four dimensional spatial framework but very difficult to understand just by looking at their hyperbolic projections, Newton faced a very difficult challenge.Newton's alchemical crystal growing experiments reflected that dilaton field in an much more complex manner. Those experiments did not provide the proper insight but they were a fair attempt at discovering dilatons.Newton arrive too early but he had the enough insight to keep looking for the dilaton framework. I benefited from Einstein's mistakes like somehow thinking that only Gravitation deformed space...:) Why would that be the case????Sheep-like scientists have been repeating this Mantra for a hundred years without ever asking that simple question.More than three hundred years ago Sir Isaac Newton asked it and pursued its answer in his Alchemical Experiments. That is what I would call the Wisdom of the Ancients.Cheers,MP

The Echoes of the Big Bang

June 9, 2008

The Big Bang and its Echoes...:)The obvious question to ask is if matter didn't, doesn't and will never travel faster than the speed of light, what generated the echoes..>:)

The Mass of a Neutrino

June 8, 2008

The Mass of a NeutrinoEinstein's paradigm of a 4D Spacetime was later patched up with compact curled spaces - one for each new unnecessary quantum number (Strangeness, Bottom-Up etc) scientists introduced into their Standard Model...:)The resulting patched Spacetime is still basically a 4D Spacetime in nature, that is, if there is a 3D point where the Universe started (Big Bang), then that same universe can return (Big Crunch) under the force of Gravitation...:)That Big Crunch depends upon the sum of all masses and that includes those ubiquitous neutrinos...:)Much speculation, calculations etc has been done on that subject.Let me tell you my view of it...:)As I mentioned in the Galileo Biggest Blunder, inertial mass and Gravitational Mass have been inadvertently made equal in the Galileo' Equivalence Principle.In my theory that is not the case. Inertial and Gravitational Masses are only the same for standard matter...:) stuff composed of protons, electrons and neutrons.Inertial mass is associated with the resistance to deformation of Fabric of Space on the footprints of matter (dilators).Gravitational mass is modeled in my theory as the 4D displacement volume associated with dilator's cycles. This means that one can have a footprint on the 3D Fabric of Space and have ZERO GRAVITATIONAL MASS. This will always be the case if the frequency of the dilaton fields are not the same as the fundamental dilator frequency.Every time someone says something about being in phase or having a frequency one has to mention what kind of clock is being used. Of course, proper time is not a good clock...;) The Tau vector (direction of Proper Time) depends upon local deformation of the Fabric of Space. This makes it clear that the only clock one can use is the Cosmological Time which is visible in both cross-sections of the Lightspeed Expanding Hyperspherical Universe shown above.To understand what one means by frequency just analyse the Neutron Coherence Diagram below:One can easily recognize the Electron and Proton sub-coherences. The remaining steps correspond to rotations within the 3D space. Notice that the two states involved (2/3,-1/3,2/3) and (2/3,2/3,-1/3) differ just by a 90 rotation around the x axis. Four rotations will bring the deformational state back into its original state.

Pion Decay Details

June 4, 2008

Pion Minus Decay DetailsI should repeat the same detailed description I created for the Delta decay.A complex coherence sequence with multiple fundamental dilator chords is a polymer, in the sense that its 3D representation seemingly contains more than one particle. In reality, one should be able to see three particles (does that rings a Bell someplace) in the case of a Pion Minus, two in the case of a Neutron...The decaying reaction for the trimeric Pion Minus can be redrawn as:

Pion Minus Decay

June 1, 2008

Is Space Expanding???

May 28, 2008

Questions and Answers - II

May 25, 2008

Questions and Answers - IIHere goes another set of questions and answers. I love a scientific debate and consider it instrumental in improving a theory, especially if the debate leads me into finding failures in my theory.Even when a debate does not unveil a logical failure, it still can be used for educational purposes. Many people might come up with similar misconceptions or doubts and they should be addressed. That said, I always expect the questioner to be able to learn from my answers....:) Otherwise, there is little educational purpose if one comes back with the same question that was just answered. Here it goes:

Thinly Veiled Ads Posing as Questions...:)

May 25, 2008

Thinly Veiled Ads Posing as Questions...:)

Questions and Answers

May 24, 2008

Questions and AnswersWhere have you gone, Dr. Zaius...:)First of all, I would like to thank the readers who exposed their questions and doubts. The most important factor in the development of any theory is criticism. Some people might consider cooperative thinking to be more relevant. That might be the case, if there isn't a strong criticism laying around. One is always best served by tackling the most pungent criticism first. Those are the stumbling blocks that should be overcome.Let's start:399287728830021830-43 said...is there shape to this (universe)or does such a 4th dimension leave 3 dimensional logic redundant1. vaccume is lack of matter? or lack of time space?2. perhaps under conditions of black hole a time space vaccume exists and for some reason looks like a the Striations of a cathode ray tube.4. this will indicate the structure of timespace3. Permeability of a vacuume will be the difference between Striations in black hole if this is found we will know that nothing exists as well as something exists within the same Medium.discuss..ANSWERSMP said...1)The Shape or topology of the proposed Universe is a 3D lightspeed expanding hypersphere. This shape is a 4D shape with simple circular 2D Cross-sections on all six (RX,RY,RZ,PsiX,PsiY,PsiZ) . Those circles expand at the speed of light, timed by an absolute Cosmological Time (Psi).Of course, our 3D shockwave is embedded into a 5D spacetime where the 4D Spacetime (PsiXYZ) is hyperbolic (due to our current choices with respect to the physical laws describing Nature) and while the other cross-section is Cartesian (RXYZ). PsiXYZ is also Cartesian if one uses the Fundamental Dilator paradigm and the Quantum Lagrangian Principle to describe particles and particle motion.The 5D Spacetime itself is just a Cartesian Manifold. Lobatchevski or Riemannian, Cartan Geometries are currently required just because of Newton's Biggest Blunder..:) A non-geometrical interpretation of what governs acceleration (F=m.a) and a correspondily incorrect Gravitational Law (with a pole..:)) and their subsequently dressing up (Classical Mechanics) are the sources of non-Cartesian geometry. This might sound like an old-timer longing to simpler times...:) but from the difficulty that people has with my simple paradigm, I believe it is not the case..:)That said about space, one has to say something about the local Fabric of Space where dilators are located. From my surfing paradigm it is obvious that the local Fabric of Space can be deformed (twisted) as the result of dilator-dilaton interaction. If one strictly ask me a question about the local Fabric of Space curvature, I would have to say that there is a curvature wherever the dilators footprint are located at any given time. Curvature on any other place is just a figment of imagination or a mathematical trick to describe a single curvature space traveled by dilatons.2) Vacuum is just lack of matter (dilators), but never lack of metric waves (dilatons).There isn't such a thing as lack of spacetime, that is, time exists independently of dilators (matter).3 and 4) The structure of spacetime from your point of view is my structure of proper spacetime, that is, the variations in local deformation (twisting) of the Fabric of Space. Proper time is the only time currently known by science. Einstein eliminated the possibility of thinking otherwise.Unlike in General Relativity where matter creates a curvature of spacetime, in my theory, dilators just create dilatons (metric waves). The curvature is always the same - the dimensional age of the Universe or lightspeed times the age of the Universe.In my theory, dilators (matter) actually dilate or shrink the metric, this could be represented by a local curvature (local Fabric of Space Twisting) but one should always keep in mind that that is not physically true. Fabric of Space Twisting is just a construct toI also mentioned that any lateral motion is always at speeds higher than the speed of light since a laterally moving dilator (not at rest with respect to the Fabric of Space) does that by surfing an dilaton interference pattern.There are no microstructure to those local Fabric of Space twisting. They correspond to just the absolute state of motion of dilators within the 3D Shockwave Universe. It is my understanding that by now, most regions are on average at rest with respect to the Fabric of Space.4) The permeability (eletric permeability) was calculated in my blogEpsilon RevisitedThe Gravitational Constant was calculated here:Miguel-de-Unamuno-and-GravitationThe elasticity of the 5D spacetime was calculated within the main paper as well as the natural frequency of Gravitational Waves.You are correct in the sense that surrounding a black hole there will be a dilaton field that will twist the Fabric of Space where dilators are located thus accelerating any dilator in its reach. That will change the proper spacetime 4D framework of those dilators in a predictable manner accordingly to the spherical symmetry of the Black Hole and to its angular momentum. I didn't dwell that much on Black Holes because they are pretty much irrelevant...:) at least much less important than the paradigm shifts needed to understand this theory.Thanks again for your interesting questions.Cheers,MP399287728830021830-43 said...

Does Mass Curve Spacetime?

May 3, 2008

Does Mass Curve Spacetime or it just feels like it does...:)

Tired Photons

April 29, 2008

Tired Photons and the Universe Distribution of Mass

The Signs you are in a Cult

April 19, 2008

The Signs you are in a CultDuring a sleepless night, I pondered what would be the signs to be looking for to know if one is in a Cult...:) You know, those groups of people held together by common believes, which many times do not warrant their allegiance...:)Examples abound, for instance the member of the Standard Model Cult, M-Theory (M stands for Mattress - keep the last S for not saving the world...:)), or Higgs Boson Cult (awaiting for the appearance of that Boson on the tail of a Cometh...Notice that I didn't rant about Einstein or Ether..>:) Those are other Cults...:)The most important aspect is the "Circling the Wagons", not let anyone with diverging ideas in and anyone out..:)In a cult, nobody wants to learn anything about any ideas other than the ones that percolates their inculcated minds by fear of losing on a good thing... a promised land... :)And by all means, nobody wants to be the Purveyor of Bad News...I applied to be part of a Poster Session on a Gordon Conference on Nuclear Chemistry... In the past, I participated in many Gordon Conferences and always had the greatest experiences...:)This time I just wanted to be on the side of a 2 by 2 foot cardboard with some pictures of the Hypergeometrical Universe topology (cross-sections), the Fundamental Dilator, the Coherent Nuclear Fusion process and maybe a Pion or two..:) Quietly awaiting for some scientist to pass by and ask the question: "What is this?"As usual, I would give my one minute spill and hopefully open their minds into other possible explanations to what is currently called Nuclear Chemistry...As you know, the Chemistry in the name reflects the current paradigm of reagents together in a hot caldron, randomly colliding until by chance they overcome the reaction barrier and skate into the product channel...If I am right, the field will be called Nonlinear Hadronics or Coherent Nonlinear Hadronics in the future. This would reflect a new way to collide the reagents in a non-random manner and paying attention to silly things like reagent polarization and making sure that there is bunching (for peak power or peak density) on the particle flow. Not unlike in electron microscopes, Deuterium and Tritium (or other reagents)would be focused onto a very, very small spot. By controlling the velocity of the flow and the focal length of the magnetic lens, optimized Nuclear Fusion would be achieved. Of course, this is a simple experiment with a possible extremely high return.I bothered to offer myself to stand patiently on the side of a cardboard while beer chugging scientists passes by, at the end of many days' worth of talks, just to deliver this new view of the Universe in an understated manner. It is worthwhile since it could save this planet.If you feel relieved that Nasa was right about Apophis asteroid, I don't. As you know they are wrong every so often...:)For one, the situation is fishy, acceptance of mistake followed by a denial...:)In addition, knowing how uncertain are the initial conditions (e.g. velocity, mass, collisions along the path of the asteroid, solar wind along the trajectory, etc) I would consider our knowledge of Apophis trajectory 22 years from now very diffuse...That would give a back-of-envelop one in two probability of collision... Well, since they didn't bother to present the details of the calculation, I have to go with my gut feeling...:)A gram of prevention is worth a pound of remediation...:)This brings me back to my motto that Physics is Important...Way too important to be left in the hands of a cult...:)Below is my application to the poster session and the rejection letter:From: Betty Tsang [mailto:tsang@nscl.msu.edu]Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 10:05 AMTo: NY2292000@YAHOO.COMSubject: Nuclear Chemistry Gordon ConferenceDear Mr. MPWould you clarify your academic background in applying to attend the2008 Nuclear Chemistry Gordon Research Conference?Thank youBetty TsangChair, 2008 Nuclear Chemistry GRC------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dear Dr. Tsang,I am attaching my resume. Since I left academia, I don't keep a CV up to date.My education is shown below:...(PhD, MSc, MBA) graduate degrees, 22 years scientific career, the broadest (multidisciplinary) background possible...My research was never directed towards Cosmology or Particle Physics. My only scientific production in that area is my theory.The theory creates a framework where particles are described by coherences between stationary states of metric deformation (dilators).The theory was successfully applied to unify Gravitation and Electromagnetism. I recasted Newton's Laws in geometrical terms (deformations of a Fabric of Space - the locus of a lightspeed expanding shock wave in a 4D spatial manifold).This logical framework was used to produce a representation for all Hyperons and isotopes. They all can be represented in terms of variations of a Fundamental Dilator.Above are the deformational states associated with the Fundamental Dilator where the in-phase phase is the electron phase.The fundamental dilator can represent all four fundamental particles: proton, electron, antiproton, positron.The paradigm can be understood through the following diagram:The coherence is a shape-shifting deformation of the metric. This coherence not only change shape (electron corresponding displacement volume to the proton equivalent – circa 2000 time larger in both expansion and compression thus resulting in proton, electron and their counter particles). In this theory there are no compact spaces. Spin is an external degree of freedom, a real rotation as opposed to being an internal degree of freedom.Dilators only interact when the overlapping between the Fundamental Dilator and the Fabric of Space is maximized. This together with a Quantum Lagrangian Principle provide the basis for Quantum Mechanics. The Quantum Lagrangian Principle was used to obtain Gravitation and Electromagnetism forces. It states simply that dilators will always dilate in phase with the surrounding dilaton field. Dilaton are the metric waves associated with the coherence.An example of a hyperon explained in terms of space deformations is presented below:This is the decaying equation for the pion minus. It decays into an muon minus and a muon neutrino.Other examples is show below:It decays into a Delta Zero, Pion Zero and Pion Minus.The Fundamental Dilator paradigm eliminates the asymmetry between electrons and protons. This theory is developed in two cross-sections of a 5D spacetime. One of the cross-sections is the familiar 4DSPacetime where Relativity was described. This theory is totally compatible with that theory.The other cross-section contains the 3D shockwave universe expanding along a Radial DirectionAs one would expect dynamics forces (magnetism) are derived in the right panel (which contains time). Static forces (Gravitation and Electrostatics) are derived in the right panel.Strong and weak forces are explained in metric deformation terms.The theory has broad implications and it is difficult to present it in a short letter. The manuscript currently is around 80 pages.This paradigm shift allow for a nonlinear hadronics paradigm shift for Nuclear Chemistry. Instead of the current paradigm of reagents, barrier to reaction, product channels, my theory permits understanding nuclear chemistry in a way similar to nonlinear optics. This means that it supports Coherent Nuclear Fusion processes. Of course, in the same way that nonlinear optical effects are many orders of magnitude more likely with coherent laser light (that using an incoherent light source), coherent nuclear processes should be order or magnitude more effective in bring about fusion products.I would appreciate if I were permitted to explain the theory.Thanks,MP------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dear Dr. MPI do not see how your interest matches with our program, please see http://www.grc.org/programs.aspx?year=2008&program=nuchem. Our program is full. There is no room for another talk. As the number of participants to the conference are limited, I have to limit the participants to scientists who are actively doing research in Reaction Physics in Nuclear Science.Thank youBetty TsangChair, 2008 Nuclear Chemistry GRC=========================------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I know I am not a member of a cult, since there isn't anyone else with me at this time..:) A cult of one...:) Well, it is possible...:)On the other hand, I failed to show the other symptoms..:) I vigorously pursue scrutiny, scientific debate and have no place to hide... If someone ask me to explain something, I would never exclude that person from a debate nor would I fail to provide a simple explanation of my theory... no matter the circumstances...I feel relieve I am not in a Cult..:)Cheers,MP------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PS- By the way, if I mentioned M-Theory as M for Mattress or complained about someone's theory is because I provide a simpler explanation which is ruled (without any disclosed reason) INNAPROPRIATE..:)I've never mean a personal attack, after all, I don't personally know any one of the actors in this play..:) My attach is always on the merits of their science and on the horrors of censorship...:)I also am quite aware of constraints on room and board for the attendees of the Gordon Conferences. That wouldn't be an issue -- I can always go to a Bed and Breakfast in the vicinity and can eat out or fast..:) I would be the last person on the planet to preclude a wide-eyed young scientist from being dazzled by science..:) I was in my time..:)

Sapor Similis Pullus

April 14, 2008

Dr. Fate

April 10, 2008

The God Particle

April 8, 2008

The God ParticleForgive me saying something against a God Particle, but this is a stretch... Not unlike Inflation Theory ( in fact, these are my two pet peeves)...I am not saying that the Fundamental Dilator is the only possible solution to the problem of Mass.I made Mass totally disappear with it...:) I succesfully replaced Mass with displacement 4D volumes within a spinning coherence: The Fundamental DilatorAbove are two electrons with opposing spins...:) and the best explanation for the existence of Cooper pairs and the why of Hund's Law. Opposing spinning electrons show zero attraction or repulsion among each other...:) That is why you can put them neatly into orbitals...:)I also explained why one Kilogram (inertial) of Electrons have Zero Gravitational Mass...:) Just a result of interaction averaging out to zero.While Peter Higgs, François Englert and Robert Brout were trying to explain Mass using some God Given Particle or God Himself, I explained Mass Away...People shouldn't mix Religion references and Science. It would be horrible if one cannot see the God Boson coming out of those Large Hadron Collider Collisions...By the way, we know that we can make "Bosons" out of collisions (e.g. Delta Zero, Pion Zero).Is Dr. Higgs telling me that Delta Zero, Pion Zero are The False ProphetParticles?How would you know that you created a Boson that gives Mass to a particle... Just because it has some weight (Mass)..:) given to itself?? That would be a quite weak proof of the existence of the God Particle...I would expect something along the lines of the God Boson coming down the pipe and interacting wih another humble particle and bestowing it the Gift of Masslessness...:) such that it would just fly faster than the speed of light out of there...:) That would make me a believer..Of course, if one could keep such God Particle around one long enough, one could ask for larger favors like making an Apple to fall upwards or downwards at infinite speed...:)In summary, I don't believe it is possible to attach to an extremely short-lived particle coming out of a collider the title of God Particle. It is my believe that I will have just to believe..:)I already believe that the Truth is Out There...:)I certainly know that whatever comes out of those collisions would be less relevant than Coherent Nuclear Fusion. I am partial...what can I say..>:)Today, I learned that there is a great theory out there which is the most accepted geometric relativistic theory. I am looking forward to read about it... I've never managed to ask if that theory contains the concept of Mass. If a contain that awful concept, it can never be really geometrical..:)

Plunger Physics and the Casimir Effect

April 2, 2008

Plunger Physics and the Casimir EffectHow and Why would one think about solving the World's Energy Problems with a Photonic Plunger? That boggles my mind...:)

Great Balls of Fire...:)

April 1, 2008

Great Balls of FireHoly Cow...:)I had a nice discussion with Kiril Chucanov in the last few days...:) As usual, from friction comes light...:)The discussion wasn't a great sucess... I wasn't able to ascertain if Kiril Chucanov was onto something or just blowing smoke...He places videos of Balls of Fire in microwave ovens..:) and claimed a 5MW Power Plant that creates energy from nothing.I wanted him to say - "Well, I injected 100 Joules and derived 1000 Joules.. or I ran the power plant for 1 hour and extracted 18000 mega Joules... " This is the heat created in just one hour by a 5MW power plant..in fact, it can be even higher if the 5MW is an output power specification as opposed to just a simple measure of available power..As you might now, to dissipate 18000 megaJoules is no small feat... I suppose the experimental setup is not linked to the power grid and that energy is extracted as heat only...This situation poses significant difficulty since one cannot dump legally large quantities of scalding water into the sink...I would expect that a working power generator based upon such discovery would only be created after clear evidence of its validity, valid patents, etc.Had he said that, I would take his word for it... That would be a meaningful statement... That amount of power would have to come out as heat and it would be trivial to measure the coolant temperature change during energy extraction...:) it would generate about 12 hundred liters or 260 gallons of boiling water per second...Nobody would have any doubt about Free Energy if he had just said what I wrote above...Any questions could only be laid on his credibility... not on experimental error.Now we will never know...:)________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________I followed up and found this in the New Scientist:Lightning balls created in the lab -10 January 2007From New Scientist Print Edition. Hazel Muir

Kiril Chucanov

March 30, 2008

Discussions about Free Energy Production

Galilean Electrodynamics

March 29, 2008

General Relativity and Stale PhysicsAs I mentioned many times since the beginning of this blog, too much reverence is a bad thing in Physics... It didn't help me with Bob Schrieffer in the past and it doesn't help anyone when we put people in pedestals.String Theorists or some of the talking heads placed their theory as something from the 23rd century...:) That is an illegal crutch for any theory..Einstein always faced tremendous opposition and of course, all that is now passed and his theory is written in stone...This is not a good thing.Any prior theory should be reviewed in light of new knowledge and that includes Einstein's, String Theory or the Hypergeometrical Universe Theory...:)Galilean Electrodynamics is a journal that supports dissident ideas and by doing it support the continued questioning of prior science.. The Galilean in its name places it directly in contraposition with anything that is not Galilean..:) Like Riemanian Geometry or Relativity.I would be the last one to critize a source of critical sense...:)Coincidently, I managed to revise Galileo Galilei's Equivalence Principle..:) That principle equates Gravitational Mass with Inertial Mass...:) It may or may not be attributable to Galileo.Please, read the blog Galileo Galilei Biggest Blunder . This blog is just next to Newton's Biggest Blunder...:) Please, let me know your comments.Cheers,MP

A Story Full of Sound and Fury..:)

March 29, 2008

Professor Smulsky

March 27, 2008

Professor Smulsky and General RelativityDear MP,Thank you for your proposition to feel free to comment.I. I begin from your words: "The physics is invisible to your eyes and instruments. It can only be seem with the eyes of the mind...", which pertain to the contemporary Physics. Such Physics is false science. It gives imaginary worlds instead the real one. I propose you to read my paper "Smulsky J.J. Conceptual Error in Contemporary Science // Proceedings of the Natural Philosophy Alliance. 13th Annual Conference 3-7 April 2006 at the University of Tulsa, OK, USA. Vol.3, No. 2. Published Space Time Analyses, Ltd. Arlington, MA,USA.- 2007. - Pp. 277-281." (http://hypergeo.s3.amazonaws.com/static/media/uploads/blog/CnErCS2.pdf)II. Hypergeometrical Universe Theory, Grand Unification, inflation and other theories are based on the General Theory of Relativity (GTR). I send you my paper "Gravitation, field and rotation of Mercury perihelion", from which you will find that it is downfall of General Theory of Relativity. GTR can be forgotten and can be thrown out. Below I give some information about my paper:Abstract: The basic components of a problem of rotation of Mercury perihelion are considered. It is shown, that offered by Paul Gerber the finite speed of gravity propagation has not substantiation. It is established, that with influence under the Newton law of gravity the perihelion in motionless reference system turns on 529.9" per one century, but on the data of observation it turns on 582.3" per one century. Early the rotation of the Sun on a movement of planets was not taken into account. The compound model of rotation of the Sun is offered which allows taking into account this influence. In view of rotation of the Sun the Newton law of gravity defines all size of perihelion rotation and defines all features of the planets movement.Conclusions1. The offered in 1898 by Paul Gerber the mechanism of finite speed of gravitation isspeculative and has no a substantiation.

Hypergeometrical Cooper Pairs

March 22, 2008

Hypergeometrical Cooper Pairs and SuperconductivityI was invited to represent the student body at the celebration of the 50 Years of the Laboratory for the Research of the Structure of Matter at Penn. It was an honor and I was dazzled by the sights of the Fathers of Quantum Mechanics in academic regallia.I sat on my chair waiting for the beginning of the talks. The gentleman on my side decided to make small talk with that young student- the little me...:) He mentioned his name:Schrieffer... I immediatelly said, " Well, I only know one Schrieffer- from Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) Superconducting Theory... "I don't really remember what did I say afterwards, but I know that I displayed way too much reverence and poor Bob Schrieffer felt unconfortable and managed to scape...:)I know for sure that I was hyperventilating...:)What can I say. I was a naive, wide-eyed student, full of admiration and respect for my fellow scientists and mainly for the visionaries who brought us to our present understanding... I didn't know that I had to play it cool, not to disturb the scientific celebrities...:)Today, I am going to explain the why there is a formation of a Cooper Pair, that is, why two mutually repulsive electrons would agree to walk togetther in a correlated manner...:)Not unlike in the case of Alan Guth's Inflation Theory of the Universe, the formation of a Cooper pair requires the absolute turning off of all critical sense in your Brains...:) Equally charge particles are mortal enemies and repeal each other with a force singularly dependent upon their distance..:) That is, the force goes to infinite when they are close..>:) Infinite!!!!!That bitter pill is gilded by words like "One build a Boson out of two Fermions"...:)This sounds great but it doesn't mean anything..:)This would mean something if there were a logical link between spin and charge...:) Current Science has no such logical connection.My theory provides the logical link between spin and charge.I hope you will pay the required attention to understand that the reason why you can place a bunch of Hypergeometrical Cooper Pairs close together is because their net interaction is ZERO and it is not because you called it a Boson nor because the pair has zero spin!!!...:)You know, the Electron was always a Fermion until BCS came up with the concept of Cooper pair. This is a dress-up but it doesn't provide any substancial explanation why a Cooper pair doesn't interact. In this very short blog, I provided such explanation and eliminated the need to dress an Electron as a Boson...:) This doesn't mean anything and doesn't provide any physical insight that will allow for the creation of Room Temperature Superconductors or other more relevant discoveries.Any dilator has spin otherwise it would had recombined with its antidilator and returned into Nothing...;) The Universe is composed only of dilators which can get together to make things that does not apparently spin. It is just appearances. Things always spins...It just happens that two four-dimensional spins can be seem in three dimensions as a 3D pseudo-rotation..:)The physics is invisible to your eyes and instruments. It can only be seem with the eyes of the mind... and I have some teardrops to clarify this subject...:)As I did in Newton First Law, I will provide the Why? You know that Why is the question that will destroy any Cybernetic Supercomputer Hell Bent on World Domination...:)Why is normally left to Theology and in Science it is always dressed up as a Principle (Equivalence Principle in Quantum Mechanics or Gravitation/Inertia, or Hamilton Principle etc) or sometimes it becomes a Conjecture..:) which is the lowest level of scientific speculation...What I am detailing here has already been mentioned in my papers and books but I guess it is always worthwhile to draw a picture...:)Let's draw the two electrons with opposing spins:You might notice something different between the two electrons. When they spin in different directions they reach different mid-points. In the spin 0.5 electron, the next state is an antiproton on its side, while it is a proton in the spin -0.5 electron (or vice-versa depeding upon definition). Of course, here we have two electron and two anti-electron phases repeling each other but we also have two proton-antiproton phases attracting each other... Thus the net repulsion is ZERO...:) That is much smaller than INFINITE ..:)From Antenae Theory you should also notice that since the Proton and Antiprotons are sideways, their attraction will only be felt in close proximity...:) Near-Field is the correct terminology...This means that there is a difference between having two electrons with the same spin and two of opposing spins.As in the Little Prince blog, What is essential is invisible to the EyesThe difference happens to be observable only in the four dimension and only when we don't have a material existence...:)This difference is not some obscure and unexplained exchange energy..:) Instead one has an electrostatic interaction between Protons and Antiprotons in a four-dimensional spatial manifold. The subject of binding energy is to be studied by adding a relative kinetic energy (temperature) to the pair. A Cooper Pair with a non-zero temperature will have a net interaction that can be calculated by magnetism, and thus can be calculated in the spacetime side of the Hypergeometrical Universe Icon above. Please read the paper or books to understand how magnetism is modeled in hypergeometrical terms.That, in a nutshell, is the reason WHY there are Cooper pairs...It is also the physical reason for the exchange energy in Quantum Mechanics.Cheers,MPPS- Next I will start with how to calculate the Mass (3D Volume overlap) of a Neutron... I will follow with the Hyperons and all isotopes..:)This is how you will be able to design the stable new elements for your spaceships...:)

Not Guth Enough...:)

March 20, 2008

Electron-Proton Fundamental Dilator Review

February 24, 2008

Electron-Proton Fundamental Dilator

Universe as a Higher Dimension Shock Wave

February 24, 2008

HyperGeometrical Universe Topology

February 24, 2008

HyperGeometrical CosmologyThe HyperGeometrical Universe theory is a simple Theory of Everything that based on clues from Relativity and Quantum Mechanics proposes that the Universe is actually an expanding shell on a light-speed expanding hyperspherical space disturbance. That shell where our Universe lies is a three dimensional hyperspherical shell that travels outwards at the speed of light.Simple inspection of the above figure allows for many conclusions.

The Balls Diagram Review

February 23, 2008

Greetings MP,I read your blog from bottom to top. I like the theory and am impressed at the breadth it covers, it's agreement with what is already known, and it's recovery of all the standard equations and constants. I easily grasp the 4D shockwave in a 5D universe, and that we are all traveling at the speed of light.Unfortunately, my math skills petered out at calculus. Even in calculus I could never remember the formulas. I always relied on visualization to gain an understanding of the problem and choose an appropriate analysis method. Then I had to recover the formula for the method from my visualization of the steps of the analysis process. Essentially, anything I can visualize, I can understand well enough to work with, but you will never see me produce neat formulas.I can just about manage to visualize 3D objects that are morphing shape while both translating and rotating. I believe this may be sufficient to be able to fully visualize your theory. I only need to get an accurate set of visualizations built up.I think I understand the 4D shockwave and absolute time. I follow the Hubble velocity being due to universe expansion, and inertia as a result of space trying to relieve the strain of a distortion. I start to get lost at the balls diagrams.I understand electron = proton = positron = anti-proton as four different rotational positions of the same 4D space distortion (dilator). I'm not certain I fully understand rotation vs. tunneling. I'm also not getting a good visual of neutrinos as pairs of transmutations.A neutrino should be just another kind of space distortion, like the electron/proton/positron/anti-proton. If so, I can see how interactions between them could possibly result in a disturbance of the synchronization of your fundamental dilator so that it began to present itself to 'reality' as a different 'particle'.There is a lot more I would like to clear up, but this is enough for a start. I hope you check this email address. I look forward to hearing from you.Thank you,Matt

Spontaneous Breakdown of Symmetry...

February 18, 2008

Spontaneous Breakdown of Symmetry and The Great Achievement of Achieving True Supersymmety

Gallileo Gallilei's Biggest Blunder

February 10, 2008

Blunders, Blunders by the KilogramGallileo has a blunder associated with his name...:) Nobody scapes... One is always partially wrong, despite of being mostly correct...:) Nothing is perfect...

Newton's Biggest Blunder

February 6, 2008

Expanding Dimensional Hypercubes

January 14, 2008

Nobody

January 13, 2008

Discussions with Nobody I continued explaining my theory at the TOEQUEST.com where I had posted some of the initial blogs of my theory.Here is the transcript of the discussion. It is always great to have an opportunity to clarify the fine points of this theory.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Nobody said:

The Stroboscopic Universe

January 12, 2008

The Stroboscopic UniverseThis blog is the continuation of a discussion about the Hypergeometrical Universe. It contains references that can be also understood by reading the blog:

The Reality of Space

January 10, 2008

The Reality of Space A reader asked me this nice and deep question:

New Year's Resolutions

January 8, 2008

Happy New Year

Merry Christmas

December 22, 2007

Merry ChristmasNaughty or NiceI was a good boy...:)Gave you my best thoughts

Some Signs of Intelligence

December 13, 2007

Some Signs of Intelligence

Coherent Nuclear Fusion

December 4, 2007

Coherent Nuclear Fusion - The Path to Infinite and Safe Energy ---------------------------------------------- The Energy Book is available for download here ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- I wrote short blog about Coherent Nuclear Fusion sometime ago. As anything, one only pays attention to form (properly marketted ideas) as oppose to ideas simply told straight-up.I had my equation for epsilon0, mu0 and G and any other derived cosmological constant since the beginning of times in my papers...:) I believe that only when I was able to create a picture of that equation in the forefront of my blog (right in front of your face) that that salient point was noticed.It took time to realize that people are impervious to anything that doesn't hit them in the face..>:)I decided to refresh another salient point or conclusion derived from my theory. I proposed the means to create an infinite source of energy in another of my postings: Coherent Nuclear Fusion.Up to now, people have been colliding particles and trying to understanding what happens from those collisions.That is a good start...:)The problem with that is that this has been done in the dark and that should not be the case after I wrote my theory.I proposed the experiment for the Large Hadron Collider: Collide particles which are traveling in the same direction, using a focusing magnetic lens... :)This is a tremendous change in paradigm since a collider normally uses head-on collisions to maximize the collision energy...:)This paradigm finesses the procedures used to create knowledge and nuclear fusion..>:)The dilator paradigm and the Hypergeometrical Standard Model creates the ideological (theoretical) basis for this new kind of experimentation.Having a focused beam of Deuterium and polarizing magnetic lensing should lead to coherent nuclear fusion processes with extremely high yield and achieved at much lower collision energy.Needless to say, this should open a window into a new future, distant from the one we are rushing into now. Currently we are just going to extract all underground carbon and burn it...:) Any carbon taken from the ground makes Earth warmer and life worse.Most likely I should make a picture of a beam and a two set of magnetic lenses: one to focus the beam and create fusion and another to redirect the beam back into the accelerator path.Coming in a separable angle would be the products of the nuclear fusion. Of course, the same process could be used for coherent nuclear fission...:)There are other sources of energy that I can envision and many unimaginable innovations (gravitational shielding, direct manipulation of the Fabric of Space, superluminal traveling, the ability to create non-interacting matter, etc)...It will take time for me to explain everything since I can't find a single human that shows a basic understanding of this theory..>:) Maybe only the Aliens from Area 51 or those crafty scientists from Livermore..>:) My goal is always To Serve Humans >:) Cheers,MP

Coherent Nuclear Fusion

December 4, 2007

Coherent Nuclear Fusion - The Path to Infinite and Safe Energy

An Infinite Source of Energy

November 25, 2007

Coherent Nuclear Fusion - The Path to Infinite and Safe Energy

Epsilon Revisited

November 23, 2007

Epsilon Revisited

HAPPY THANKSGIVING

November 20, 2007

HAPPY THANKSGIVING!!!! My friend wrote:

The Land of The Brave

November 19, 2007

The Land of The BraveEvery so often I make a summary of what the theory is about. Many people join this site every day and they could benefit from a recap.Some people might mistake that with some sort of bragging..:) That couldn't be farther from the truth...This theory is only useful or valid if people take their kid gloves and take their best punches at it...:) What my summary provides is a clear target to welcome criticism or peer review...:)Science is a contact sport... People are allowed to have their opinions and if they are not well grounded, people should get their asses kicked...:) Politely if possible...:) but a bad argument should never be left standing..:)Here is an example of myself taking it up in the chin...:)>How is epsilon0 or mu0 related to the charge of an electron or to the Avogrado's number???? (this is my question after my friend told me that epsilon0 >and mu0 had formulas or definitions) It isn't related to qe and Na(apart from the fact that it is in Js2C-2m-1 units) but you have said you are assuming qe. mu0 = 4pi x10^ -7 exactly. That is what it says on my list of fundamental constants courtesy of P.W.Atkins.. Not even Wikipedia can get pi wrong by 0.8% Or have you discovered a new value of pi in your 4D universe? (Annoying smiley deliberately omitted)Have you been deleted from Wikipedia as well? Probably for taking the name of the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus in vain. Ockham's Razor to validade Santa Klaus, Eastern Bunny>By the way, I value your criticism even when it is half-baked...:) One never knows when a good idea would come out of your mind..:) My aim isn't to have a good idea, it is just to get rid of some of your bad ideas.

The Silence of The Lambs

November 14, 2007

The Silence of The Lambs..:)This blog is about to reach its 9000 unique IP readers...:) Hurray!!!!I didn't know there were so many cosmologists, string theorists, particle physicists in the planet...:)There are many reasons to celebrate...The theory has been published in two books:

The Matter-Antimatter Anihilation

November 9, 2007

How does Matter-Antimatter Anihilate each other???..:)Ask this simple question to a physicist. After looking like a deer on headlights for a some time, he/she will start mumbling something and writing some Feynman diagrams showing wiggling lines representing photons, positrons and electrons..>:)

The Nature of a Photon

November 9, 2007

What is a Photon ??

Matter-Antimatter Ratio

November 6, 2007

Miguel de Unamuno and the Gravitational "Constant"

November 5, 2007

Comet Holmes

November 3, 2007

Ideas are ImportantThis together with the value of critique are the main themes of this blog ....Last week a comet was born. This may or may not pose a threat to our planet. Someday, one will and we should be as ready as possible to face that challenge. This is not a scary tactic. This is just an Evolution tactic. Ideas should fight each other in the realm of our rationality. The winner should be the best we can come up with and not the ones Paul Ginsparg protects. Evolution should proceed at a fast clip...There is no time to waste.I decided to use his name even though I know I might be given him too much credit. The acts that prevent the free discussion of ideas in Physics might be just the simple result of mindless automaton processes. Simple rules like avoid challenging the past or the big wigs or disregard people who cannot influence my grants might be enough to generate this complex behavior...:)In any event, here are the pretty pictures of the Comet... Remember, there is one with your name on it somewhere out there...:)A composite image shows Comet Holmes' movement over the last 48 hours on Saturday Oct. 27 2007 on the left and Monday Oct. 29 2007 on the right in the Northeastern night sky in the constellation Perseus, taken in Tyler, Texas. The comet surprised astronomers last week by becoming suddenly visible and now it's surrounding gas cloud continues increasing in brightness and size and is visible to the unaided eye. (AP Photo/Dr. Scott M. Lieberman) By the way, since if you don't say it now you have to hold your peace forever, the Alien community agree that this is a good theory...:)

Cosmological Constant G

November 3, 2007

How to Calculate the Cosmological Constant GNeedless to say, G - The Gravitational Constant - has been the strongest pillar of our understanding of the Cosmos. Everything in the Cosmos is governed by it. Any model on how we started depends upon it.Everytime we look into the skies and try to conclude something about a tremendous explosion that happened Eons ago in a very far place, we need to be sure that G is always the same...:) Otherwise how could we derive any conclusion about collisions (they are driven by G through Gravitational forces)...:)Everytime you hear about the Gigantic Black Holes that might have seeded our Galaxies, you are modeling the dynamics through a constant G.It turned out that for you to have a single description of Gravitation and Electromagnetism, you need a Cosmological Time dependent G, that is, G has to be inverselly proportional to 4D radius of the Universe.This means that G was two times larger some 7 billion light years ago and millions, billions, trillions of times larger at the beginning of times.I calculated the supersymmetry condition for the Gravitational and Electromagnetic forces to be equal. It is in the paper, book and links on this site.Next, this theory provides another impossibility... The simple calculation of the Gravitational Constant as a function of the 4D Radius of the Universe or the Cosmological Time. Double-click the images below for a larger picture.

Area 51 - Where is my MapLoco

November 3, 2007

Area 51Aliens,What have you done to my MapLoco Visitor's Map???? This was to be expected...:) Aliens always keep a low profile...:) If discovered they get a wedgie from their superiors...:) I had to redo my MapLoco, by now it should have a filter for anything Alien...:) thus eliminating the track record of Alien existence...:) Only Aliens would have the powers to cajole MapLoco to erase my data there...:)

Area 51

November 1, 2007

Area 51

Miguel de Unamuno

October 26, 2007

"Only he who attempts the absurd is capable of achieving the impossible"Miguel de UnamunoI couldn't resist....:) Check the interview. It is quite funny....Well, well... We are experiencing Technical Difficulties and you might have to go to the link itself until I figure out how to put a video in this blog...:)In fact, I heard that Presidential Candidate Dennis Kucinich also carries a pocket copy of my Vacuum Permittivity Formula...:)I forgot to mention, another source of error might be Wikipedia...:) All my numbers comes from that handy source...:)There is also a numerically invisible 1Kg on the denominator of mu and in the numerator of epsilon, otherwise the units would be incorrect. Please check the derivation on the pdf for details.The error in the estimation of the Vacuum Permittivity is 0.008:1 or0.8%I hope you people are smart enough to understand that the error estimate in this case also means that conversely there is a 0.8% possible error in the estimation of the fundamental dilator 4DMass or more precisely there is a total propagated error of 0.8% from all the sources...:) Remember that I use the preferential reference frame to derive the forces. I didn't take Gravitation or absolute speed in consideration.Even the most retarded editor/moderator etc would be impressed with those numbers...:) after all this is a quantity that is IMPOSSIBLE to be calculated...:0I am still awaiting for Stephen Hawking's reply...:)Cheers,MP

Hypergeometrical Epsilon

October 24, 2007

How to calculate Cosmological ConstantsThe vacuum permitivity is a Cosmological Constant, that is, there is NO formula for it. That might be the case in other theories.In fact, this is a great time for a DARE.... :) Just to check if you people are awaken or not...:) Go ahead and ask Stephen Hawking if he knows how to calculate THE PERMITTIVITY OF VACUUM....:)I bet money he doesn't...:)Well, I am trying to emphasize how different my theory is from M Theory, String Theory or any other.... In any other theory, someone would present some Lagrangian, Metric for some wildly guessed scenario (e.g. branes under Gravitation interaction)...:) and from that imaginary Universe they would extract some impossible to measure results.... Not too long ago someone calculated that the Gravitational fields between branes decays exponentially... while decaying inversely with the square of distance within the brane...:) At the time, this was heralded as a challenge to Einstein and/or Newton... I thought to myself, Ginsparg has the petulance to preclude me from using a megabyte of hard drive on his Cornell-Los Alamos Arxives... and this piece of speculative science is hailed as great science... I should say that I am only mentioning this specific case because I can remember it...

So much for Wikipedia

October 22, 2007

Wikipedia Entry Set for Speedy Deletion -I considered writing a small posting on Wikipedia to explain the Fundamental Dilator Paradigm. This is a fundamental part of my theory and the link (hidden variable) that allow one goes from Classical Mechanics to Quantum Mechanics...:)I wrote the following little thing:== Fundamental Dilator in the Hypergeometrical Universe Model ==In the Hypergeometrical Universe Model,“particles” are considered to be coherences between 4D stationary states of metric deformation. These coherence can have spin (rotation along any axis perpendicular to R), and nuclear angular momentum (rotation around any axis in the Fabric of Space).The Fabric of Space (FS) is defined within the Hypergeometrical Universe Model as the lightspeed traveling locus where all the dilators are located. This corresponds to a 3D hypersurface on non-compact Cartesian four-dimensional space. This lightspeed expanding hypersurface contains our 3D Universe.Local deformations of the Fabric of Space are achieved by dilator dilaton field interactions which result in acceleration and eventually in constant velocity lateral travel. The inertial motion is how the Fabric of Space relaxes. Dilators will travel until they reach their Hubble angle. This is the Hypergeometrical Universe Newton’s First Law.Since the boundary where the Universe (3D) is located is moving at the speed of light along R, the Hypergeometrical Universe Model does not contain the concept of particle since that doesn’t include the inherent lighspeed motion and has inherently some immutability assumptions.The dilator is by definition mobile and always tunneling back and forth. It can have non-zero spin. In the Hypergeometrical Standard Model presented in the Hypergeometrical Universe blog, all particles models are shown to be decomposable into variations of the fundamental dilator. Different phases of the fundamental dilator correspond to Proton, Electron, Positron and antiproton.There is an obvious analogy to musical notes. Each dilator phase (proton, electron, antiproton and positron) can be thought as dimensional notes (notes that modulate the space metric as opposed to air density).Electron ModelFigure 1. 4D Stationary Deformation State diagram for electronThe coherence four notes repeat forever.Where p=(2/3,2/3,-1/3), p*=(2/3,-1/3,2/3),e=(0,-2/3,-1/3),e*=(0,-1/3,-2/3) are a subset of states involved in the most common “particles”= proton, electron and neutron, isotopes, hyperons.Below is another representation of the electron and positron. Notice that the first and last elements of the coherence chain are the same and that the coherence repeats itself for its lifetime. In the case of a proton/electron, that lifetime is infinite, since that coherence is between two ground states. Figure 2. Dimensional notes associated with Electron and Positron.Yellow (ligther)= positive charge.Green (darker)= Negative charge.White = Invisible in 3D due to 4D orientation – perpendicular to the Fabric of Space.This is an effort to represent a tumbling 4D object, which changes shape as it tumbles. Notice that the sidewise states have no FS overlap. Interaction or “Existence” depends upon FS overlap and the frequency matching with the other dilators. This is the reason behind representing all “particle” in terms of the Fundamental Dilator or the Hypergeometrical Standard Model.Since in the theory, there is an absolute time, one can define an absolute phase and that is what distinguishes an electron from a positron. Later it will be clear that more complex coherences involving the p* and e* state (neutrino states) will result in a phase shift of the tunneling process with respect to the tumbling process, thus modifying which state is in phase with the shock-wave universe.The colors are shown only for states that have both a FS overlap and the same frequency as the fundamental dilator.Another important element of the model is the bolding of the third axis length (e.g. p=(2/3,2/3,-1/3)). This means that the spin is a tumbling process around and rotational axis perpendicular to both the radial direction (perpendicular to all three spatial coordinates and the z coordinate). This defines a 4D angular momentum, which has to be conserved. More complex coherences like the ones associated with Delta and Sigma particles differs just by the final spin and thus by how the sub-coherences tumbles to make up the final amount of spinning.Proton ModelSimilarly for a proton: Figure 3. 4D Stationary Deformation State diagram for protonThe coherence’s four notes repeat forever, thus the fourth state is represented connecting to the initial state emphasizing the closing of the coherence cycle. Belly up states represent anti-states (anti-proton or positron states).Here is the representation of a proton and an antiproton. Figure 4. Dimensional notes associated with Proton and anti-Proton.The fundamental dilator is the paradigm behind the Fat Electron (4DMass=1.004145287 a.m.u. electron) used in the derivations of Electrostatic and Biot-Savart Laws in the Hypergeometrical Universe Model.3D and 4D MassesThe Hypergeometrical Universe Model is a purely geometrical theory. This means that there is no concept of Mass, Charge, Force. Instead of Mass one has 4D displacement volumes (4DMasses) and their equivalent 3D FS Overlap displacement volumes (3DMasses).This means that the dilaton field (lighspeed traveling dilatons) are coherently generated by all the four phases of the fundamental dilator and thus sense the equivalent volume of a proton and an electron. This means that the 4D Mass of Proton,Antiproton,Electron and Positron are the same.Newton’s :Law of Gravitation, Gauss Law of Electrostatics and Biot-Savart Law of Magnetism were rederived from first principles as a law guiding dilator motion subject to a four-dimensional dilaton field. A Quantum Lagrangian Principle was proposed based on the minimization of virtual work done by constraints (FS). This QLP states that a dilator will step through the de Broglie expansion always in phase with the surrounding dilaton field.Hence, 3DMass is the overlap of the fundamental dilator displacement volume with the FS.The 4DMass can be understood as a mass proportional to the 4D volume associated with a dilator cycle. In a dilator cycle one has the two phases of an electron and the two phases of a proton, thus resulting in a coherent displacement 4D volume of a proton and an electron. The ideal 4DMass would be 1.00785 a.m.u.. The discrepancy is the result that the 4D space is not totally isotropic, that is, the shock-wave universe creates a small anisotropy that makes radial and FS orientations different in terms of displacement volumes of coherent states.Below is the corresponding Balls Diagram for the Neutron and the Hydrogen Atom.Figure 5. This figure displays the Neutron and Hydrogen Atom diagrams. Notice the red lines corresponding to the transmutation notes. These transmutation notes correspond to 3D rotations of the 4D displacement volume at specific phases of the dilator coherence.The Hypergeometrial Model is based on the following diagram:Figure 6. This figure shows the two cross-sections representing the Hypergeometrical Universe Model. The 3D Universe topology is one of a four-dimensional shockwave traveling at the speed of light perpendicular to our space.==References==Quantization in Astrophysics, Brownian Motion, and Supersymmetry (2007) editors: Florentin Smarandache; V. Christianto ISBN 819021909X----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

How to Write a Theory of Everything

October 21, 2007

How to Write a Theory of EverythingIt turns out that writing a theory of everything is not a simple as you might think. The first reason being that every scientist would hate to have someone else writing it before them..:) That explains some of the reactionary responses to my efforts to disseminate my ideas. The second reason is the necessarily wide scope of the writing. A theory of everything has to replicate all data associated with Cosmology, our concepts of Cosmogenesis, Quantum Mechanics and Particle Physics (preferably in compliance with the Standard Model and written in terms of Strings or Branes)..:) After all it is just common cortesy to write it in the language of the people who will read it...:)

Hypergeometrical Universe Epsilon

October 21, 2007

How to calculate Cosmological Constants

Where is the Hyperon Family?

October 16, 2007

Mismanagement at Cornell-Los Alamos Arxives

October 16, 2007

Mismanagement at Cornell-Los Alamos Arxives

Alia iacta est

October 14, 2007

Alia iacta estSteven Colbert is a man of vision..>:)As you know, he was supporting me at my first blog. Pretty soon, I will pay him back with the release of my book below and a brief homage..:) I hope you like the icon associated with the theory and book. You should have no trouble recognizing the paradigm of The Flying Orchestra representing our lightspeed expanding hyperspherical Universe with their singing dilators...:) (you and me included in the chorus)...:) The two eyes are the two cross-sections of the Hypergeometrical Universe, and the side adornments are the two phases of the fundamental dilator representing the proton and electron, thus summarizing the theory in a single picture.

Deuterium Coherent Fusion Questions

October 11, 2007

Deuterium Coherent Fusion Questions:William asked: On page 68 of the second paper under papers in your blog you are discussingnuclear fusion of deuterium.The diagram labeled deuterium showsinteraction of one electron with one nuetron, but deuterium has twoneutrons.Does your theory predict any new experimental observationsthat havebeen verified?What does your theory say about dark energyand mass? It is always a pleasure answering questions and having the theory defend itself...:) I will do my part..>:)Let's see what Wikipedia tells us about Deuterium:

The Passage of Time

October 9, 2007

3D Masses - Better Explanation

September 23, 2007

The Man Who Knew Too Much...:)

September 20, 2007

As Time goes by

September 15, 2007

The Twin Paradox

A. Chicken Thieves ..:)

August 29, 2007

Spanking Science - Inappropriate Submissions...:)

August 28, 2007

Review of the "Review"Let me make it very clear. I tried to present a non-orthodox view of science and that was censored without an appropriate justification. Just in case you don't realized it, the argument below is a cynical or ironical consideration.It is cynical because a conclusion of conspiracy//collusion can be easily derived from the obstacles Los Alamos (i.e. the moderators) place on the intellectual production of the people who doesn't review their grants or papers, see them in conferences etc...- the unafilliated people.I have a hard time stating what I am stating, since I know crackpot literature... Half-backed ideas and I don't like them... On the other hand, it takes me just a few minutes to find some flaw in their argument and move on. So there is no need for censorship. Categorizing is enough. I have to do the same for crackpot ideas from affiliated people (university affiliated people).A simple solution to the problem can be easily achieved by providing a subsection on the site for speculative science by non-afilliated people. One can envision the same kind of reviewing protocol as in Philica.com and a larger and searcheable abstract. If necessary one might limit the volume of contribution to some arbitrary size, such that prolific people concentrate on their best ideas... but that should be larger than a large manuscript... Sometimes people have something interesting to say which requires lots of explanations...:)This would eliminate the need for the horrendous barrier of finding an endorser. I tried to contact many potential endorsers and they certainly didn't give me the time of the day. This in itself is a tremendous censorship of new ideas.Since I've just provided a simple solution to the problem, censorship has to be the goal of the moderators...Q.E.D.In addition, the moderation process is not described in the submission protocol. I don't really understand how one can substitute the discussions I had with my endorser - who is a particle physicist and who published on the High Energy Physics section in the past - by a moderator's glance of my work.Irony and Cynicism Below...:)

Spanking Science - The Review ...:)

August 28, 2007

This is a cynical and hopefully humorous analysis of how could such review come about. Of course, I hope to be wrong and I sent an email requesting clarification. In the event of a clear response, it will be clear to me that I didn't have any good reason to be so cynical...:)I will keep you posted on my communications with Los Alamos.____________________________________________I tried to imagine how such a vacuous review could have been written and started envisioning the events as follow:

A Little Bit about Censorship

August 28, 2007

Censorship by Philip Helbig, sci.physics.research co-moderator

August 28, 2007

CENSORSHIPI guess I will have to receive the Nobel Prize before I can post anything in the sci.physics.research Yahoo Group.One can always say that scientists are cold and calculating, but you can say that at least some of them are very, very, very sensitive...:)These small subset need to protect their sensibilities from any challenges to what they believe is the correct interpretation of reality.These people are giving Science a bad name... It is a shame... Newton, Einstein and any other scientist with a revolutionary idea would be blocked in the United States of America scientific environment controlled by Dr. Ginsparg (Los Alamos-Cornell arquives) or this Dr. Helbig. It is a shame... if I didn't mention that before...:)It is suprising that, Dr. Helbig would consider my theory speculative and at the same time, they would publish crap about creating Universes in laboratory or inter-brane interactions etc... It boggles my mind..>:)From this interaction you can imagine the odds of me publishing anything along the lines of what I wrote in this blog...:) Every idea I created here and tried to convey to academia were always blocked without any justification by the likes of Dr. Helbig or Paul Ginsparg- the de facto owner of the Los Alamos Arquives.Please follow the links and look for censorship at the Los Alamos Arquives (paid by your tax dollars) by Paul Ginsparg. Here is the linkhttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=los+alamos+arquives+censorshipI will make another attempt to publish my little Grand Unification Theory at the Los Alamos Arquives this week.Please write to the Dean of the Cornell University requesting that pressure be exerted on Dr. Ginsparg to provide at least an explanation why he would just deem my theory INAPPROPRIATE...:)ProvostCarolyn (Biddy) Martincam18@cornell.edu(607) 255-2364Or in a more tactful manner, please write or call Dr. Ginsparg and tell him about the relevance of my theory and that it deserves a few bits of storage in one of the Los Alamos servers..>:) It is not too much to ask...:)Please do the same for Dr. Helbig, the co-moderator of the sci.physics.research Yahoo Group. Here is his email:Phillip Helbig helbig@astro.multivax.deCheers,MP--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Phillip Helbig X-Ray..:)<helbig@astro.multivax.de>to meshow details4:53 am (3 hours ago)Unfortunately, the article you posted to sci.physics.research isinappropriate for the newsgroup because it is too speculative.Please note that, since the article was posted to a moderated group andwas not approved, it will not appear in ANY newsgroup. If you want topost it to any unmoderated newsgroup, you must post it again, avoidingany moderated newsgroups.Keep in mind that posts are randomly distributed to one of the ACTIVEco-moderators. At any given time, one or more of these can be inactive.If, rather than resubmitting a post in the normal way, you email amoderator directly, it might arrive while he is inactive, causing anunnecessary delay.Sincerely,Phillip Helbig, sci.physics.research co-moderator------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Below is my threatening posting:I finished blogging the assignment for all the Hyperon Family using only a single dilaton coherence - the fundamental dilator - and the three Neutrino subcoherences (ElectronNeutrino, MuonNeutrino and TauNeutrino).This comprises the Hypergeometrical Standard Model and offers a simple and clear alternative to the Standard Model. The Hypergeometrical Universe provides Grand Unification.The site is http://hypergeometricaluniverse.com/If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to post them to the blog. Any intelligent comment, suggestion or correction would be valued and invaluable.Best,MP------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------and my replyDear Dr. Heilbig,I would appreciate if you were to give any thought to the fact that I created a model in which I replicate both Electromagnetism, Gravitation from a simple equation, modeled all the Hyperons using a simple paradigm of metric deformation coherences (fundamental dilator) and was able to calculate their masses in a simple manner and from first principles.That should be worth a simple two paragraphs posting.If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me.Thanks,MP

Inappropriate Submissions...Communications

August 28, 2007

Maybe I was in bad mood after all...:) What can I say.... I am just human...:) My last blog was a quasi-coherent rant (to be kind to myself) and to a high degree it did not provide a clear view of what really happened and what I think. I will organize the argument properly here.I decided that the last blog was way tooooo melodramatic and decided to divide it into three. This one will keep the Los Alamos ArXives communications...

Hypergeometrical Universe Censorship

August 28, 2007

Hypergeometrical Universe CensorshipSometimes you have to get over your troubles and see things in a clearer manner.I realized that the inherent difficulties in the introduction to a new physics to old scientist were distracting in my old blog.I decided to move those blogs here and stop crying like a baby...:)Here they are, just for sake of keeping the historical perspective correct.I don't know if I am proud of so much complaining or ashamed...:)What can I say, I am just human after all..Cheers,MP

Questions

August 26, 2007

Questions:I received this question about WHAT...:)Since we all can learn from WHAT as well as WHY, here is the question and the answer:It will be nice if you can explain WHAT you show is new, which was not shown or proven for Hyperons in conventional quark models (QCD) ?I like your rotated diagramsThe WHAT is everything....This is a total departure from existing Physics from the point defined by Newton's Four Natural Laws.

To Serve Humans

August 25, 2007

To Serve Humans

The Grand Finalle- The Omegas

August 25, 2007

The Grand Finalle- The Omegas

The Smoking Xis

August 25, 2007

THE SMOKING XISComing down the pipe are the XIS. Below are the assignment for XI Zero and XI Minus: which decays into Lambda Zero plus a Pion Minus...:) (remember that Lambda Zero is just another spin configuration of Delta Zero)

The Kaons

August 25, 2007

The KaonsThe Kaons is a detour. Up to know we only analysed particles that contained Electron-Neutrinos (Electron-Proton-Electron transmutation transitions) or Muon-Neutrinos (Electron-Positron-Electron transmutation transitions)The Kaons will involve the last known neutrino: The Tau Neutrino.Let's start with the Kaon Minus assignment:which decays into a Pion Minus plus a Pion Zero.

The Twisted Deltas - The Puzzling Delta Plus Plus

August 25, 2007

The Twisted Deltas - The Great Delta Zero

August 25, 2007

The Twisted Deltas - The Great Delta ZeroThe next Delta will blow your mind away...:) it becomes more complex as time goes by...:) I can see your Brain gears moving already...:)Delta Zero is a step above in terms of complexity both structurally and in terms of the dissociation dynamics.Below is its assignment. The assignment is based upon the decay pathway: DeltaZero -> Neutron plus PionZeroA simple rearrangement of red and blue lines yields the diagram below:The other decay pathways is more complex: DeltaZero -> Proton + Pion Minus.The first step in this pathway is shown below:This shows the Proton detachment but it is still unclear how the other moiety can correspond to a Pion Minus...:) The first step in the simplification is to eliminate the Electron-Proton spin 1/2 followed by an Proton-Electron spin -1/2 transmutation, leaving the basic Pion Minus plus an electron and a positron extras.To understand the next decaying steps, one should think about these multichords in a multimeric fashion. This initial stage is pentameric. The state of the products can be understood from the diagram below:Notice the five concurrent multichords associated with this excited state Pion Minus. This means just after Proton detachments, one is left with a pentameric moiety. This means that there will be a positron and an electron with opposing spins facing each other in the 3D Universe. The metric displacement volumes associated with both adds up to zero and that means that there will be no loss of 3D Volume (3D Mass or Energy) if a Positron and its counterparty electron are eliminated from the multichord coherence. The resulting trimeric moiety is what we call Pion Minus and it is shown below:which is the same as :in our short hand representation.Remember that a multichord particle will have an extra degree of freedom (the 3D moment of inertia of the "nuclear" particle). It pseudo-rotate at a very specific angle at each de Broglie step of the Shock Wave Universe expansion.This extra degree of freedom permits the positron electron anihilation without change in the 3D Mass or energy.I hope you are having fun...:) Sigma Zero decays into Lambda Zero plus Gamma Ray, thus it should contain and extra electron-positron pair responsible by the Gamma Ray.

Pion Zero - Majorama Coherence

August 25, 2007

Pion Zero - Majorama CoherenceTheoreticians make a big fuss of Majorama particles....:) It turned out that their speculation was correct (within my model) and that Pion Zero is its own anti-Particle...:) It should be clear that one can rearrange the coherence such that the electrons go into the interior of the multichord coherence and that Electron-Proton-Electron is the same as Positron-AntiProton-Positro transmutation transition.

The Twisted Deltas - Delta Minus

August 23, 2007

The Twisted Deltas - Delta Plus

August 22, 2007

The Twisted Deltas - The Delta PlusYou haven't seen anything until you see the Twisted Deltas...:)The Deltas have spin 3/2...:) and are complex dimensional multichords. They are also big and difficult to blog. Blogger makes them too small to read, almost... Later I will post links to the full size pictures.The same diagrams will be in the updated Grand Unification paper as soon as I finish polishing it. The old version is on the papers section of this blog.Below is the Delta Plus....I should be self-evident that one can decompose it into a Neutron and a Pion Plus...:) Well, maybe you might need a little help here...Below is the Neutron plus Pion Plus decay products.Notice that one made use of the fact that a Electron-Proton-Electron is the same things as a Positron-AntiProton-Positron transmutation.Notice that the Delta Plus Dimensional Multichord contains exactly two Blue Transmultation Transitions (blue lines = electron-positron or positron-electron transmutations) and four Red Transmutations Transitions (red lines= electron-proton or proton-electron transmutations).

Hyperons - Review up to the Pion Family

August 20, 2007

Hyperon Review:Let's take a look on the Fundamental Dilator and their relatives - The Hyperons. The fundamental dilator is what we call a Proton or an Electron. Depending upon which phase is in phase with the Hyperspherical Lightspeed Expanding Universe one can have one or the other.Transmutation transions can connect dimensional chords (each dimensional chord expresses the four phases of the fundamental dilator) and change the character of the dilator. I was able to create a full replacement for the Standard Model that makes use of dimensional chords and simple transmutation transitions/ transmutation chords.Let take a look at the Fundamental Dilator once again.The Electron(Proton):The fundamental dilator is a 4D coherence between stationary states of deformation. The deformation of space is quantized, that is, can be represented as states in a 4D double potential well.The respective coherences for Electron and Proton are shown below: and for a Proton: Notice that the Proton and Electron coherences differ only by which is the initial (in phase) state in the coherence. The states associated with the Electron (0,-2/3,-1/3) and (0,-1/3,-2/3) differ not by "energy" since they have the same 3D volume (the Hpergeometrical Universe equivalent to Energy is the 3D projection of the 4D Volume) but by time. It takes time to rotate the dilator around (at the speed of light) and that introduces an extra phase delay on the Tunnelling Process with respect to the Spinning Process. Remember that all particles in the Universe are described in terms of combinations of this two fundamental dilators and that they have Spin Half, that is, they spin at half the speed of tunneling...:) A nice touch, I might say...:)

Faster than The Speed of Light Propagation

August 19, 2007

Faster than a Speeding Bullet

Linear and Hyperbolic Spaces

August 19, 2007

Hypergeometrical Covariance

August 19, 2007

Criticism and the Scientific Method

August 19, 2007

Criticism and the Scientific Method

Critique 2

August 19, 2007

Critique 1

August 19, 2007

The Simple Minded Fat Electron and Proper Time Quantization

July 15, 2007

neutrino57 said...You are on the right track. Time IS quanticized. As is space. Read my blogs on HU-LU-WU (3-d superstring theory) and Gluons.The basic theory of the universe ought to be simple enough for anyone to understand. Do you think a photon has to refer to a tiny scientific calculator every time it moves? No, it just goes!

Anything essential is invisible to the eyes...

July 14, 2007

The Fabric of Space

July 14, 2007

The Fabric of SpaceBy now, Dr. Zaius, you might be able to understand that the Fabric of Space is actually the dynamic four dimensional membrane that stretches as the hyperspherical shockwave Universe expands at the speed of light. The treads are not neatly spaced and isotropic., they are the maximae of the interference of all dilatons generated by all dilators since the begining of the times.In fact, it is not a membrane at all. It is the loci representing the solutions to the Quantum Lagrangian Principle requiring each and every dilator to land on a dilaton field maximum at each step of the Universe expansion. For each dilator that will have more than one solution and will be represented by a volume in 3D. Needless to say, this is the Hidden Variable problem that Einstein tried to solve. Everything is based on the simplest equation ever. This loci is a mesh with a very small spacing (Compton wavelegth of a one atomic mass unit dilator). Basically the size of a nucleus. The radius of curvature of this mess is around 15 billion light years....:)

Fundamental Dilator - The Basics

July 13, 2007

Fundamental Dilator - The BasicsDr. Zaius said... Well, personally I don't have too much trouble understanding four-dimensional models at least in a sense of analogy. In fact, assuming that your theory holds its waters empirically and mathematically, the idea of expanding hyper spherical wave in five dimensions makes more sense to me than many other theories.As far as your four-dimensional dilator goes... I'm not sure yet. The way I understand it at the moment, considering that I did not thoroughly read everything you published so far, is that you propose some deformation in 4D space in a form of some rotating ellipsoid. Its rotation produces waves. Those waves are coherent and produce certain interference patterns, which manifest themselves as our matter. Am I far off base here? The part that I find difficult to relate to is the concept of double well potential. It doesn't seem to carry much meaning in itself.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------It is a pleasure seeing your Brain at work...:) You are not far, maybe a little....:)Let's tackle the problem in a rational way. First forget that there is charge and mass and consider the approach I proposed to solve the differences between Gravitation and Electrostatics:I consider that the interaction between charged particles and non-charged particles to be the same, the difference in response is due to the "particle" the dilaton waves are effecting.Language is a problem. You are used to the concept of particle and that is a very primitive concept. Let me introduce the concept of dilator:

Do you understand the Fundamental Dilator Paradigm???

July 13, 2007

Let no man ignorant of geometry enter here.

Dr. Zaius

July 10, 2007

Dr. Zaius said...

Comment #3 - The Forest By The Trees

July 10, 2007

The Forest by the Trees

Balls Diagram Review

July 8, 2007

The Balls DiagramThis is a review of the Balls Diagram, which will be valuable in understanding the rest of the Hyperons....:)As you know, didactics requires some memorable associations and I thougtht about this one while listenig to Chris Matthews' Hardball. Valentine's Day was also in my mind...:)So let's learn some physics up, Fellas.:)The Balls Diagram has been shown for the initial particles of the Hyperon Family and even though they should be self-evident, I thought that it would be worthwhile to spend a blog on it...:)Let's take the Coherence Diagram for the Pion Minus for simplicity and its corresponding Balls Diagram.Pion Minus

Brief Review on How We Know What We Think We Know

July 8, 2007

Comments #3 Brief Review of How We Know What We Think We KnowI said... How do we know what we think we know?------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Without the benefit of seeing the skinny fourth spatial dimension, we couldn't really measure those 4D volumes and very small angles, so we concocted the concept of Mass (the 3D projection of a 4D Volume).If you don't know that you are traveling radially at the speed of light, your 3D observations and body of knowledge will have to be adjusted to consider lightspeed to be the limiting speed on the 3D sliver of Universe you live. That entails stretching proper time, contracting space, etc.I don't know who else did it, but I certainly did notice that Lorentz transformations is equivalent to a rotation by an imaginary angle and that time is imaginary in Physics.The point is that by discovering Lorentz transformations we postponed another 100 years the discovery that we are all in motion at the speed of light. Were I am certainly being optmistic in believing people will eventually discover my work..:)I appologize for being loud and sometimes outrageous or at least defiant in my corner of the internet... It is very, very quiet here and sometimes one has to scream to check to see if anyone is listening...:)Next, I've just copied a prior blog - sanitized from some of my sense of isolation - in preparation for better blogs about the Hyperons... The Hyperon work was done last year end, during my vacation....I was pleasantly distracted and had only some of my attention on the problem.... so they might be perfect or not... I didn't reconsider the assignment problem to check for mistakes... I welcome any suggestions, corrections..In my paper, I expressed Newton's equation as:

Comment #2 on the Silver Surfer

July 7, 2007

Comments #2 on The Silver Surfer and The Hypergeometrical UniverseAnonymous said... Ok, I see it. I guess it explains the lateral motion. But what about the radial? If one was to take a "surfer" analogy literally, one would have to assume a presence of a force perpendicular to the plain of "surfing". I.e. the only reason a real surfer can move forward is because of a gravity pulling him perpendicular to the surface of water, water resisting it, and a moving wave. So, if we live on the edge of a 4D shockwave, then there should be some force pulling us in the fifth dimension, shouldn't there?------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------First of ALL, let me thank you for asking me such meaningful and thoughtful questions.This is a wonderful question, Anonymous... I prayed everyday for such an event, and finally got my prayers answered ...:) He sent me a real Surfer (I mean, a Real Physicist...:)First, let me remind you that the force on a Surfer is also trying to reach equilibrium or relaxation and that althought there is a Force and there is motion, if one disregards friction between the surfboard and the water and changes in height, there isn't work been done. The Force is just a boundary force or virtual force not unlike the force the ground exerts on us. The same is valid for the hypersuperficial force :).First I will give you the short answer :Radial (and lateral) propagation is driven by restoring metric forces (I calculated the 4D space deformation spring constant in my Grand Unification Paper). One can surf a transversal sea wave (where Gravity is the restoring force) or a shock wave (longitudinal wave) from a Supernova explosion (pressure being the restoring force). There are dissipation, acceleration and masses in these analogies, but in my theory there are only dilatons (traveling metric modulations) and dilators (coherences between 4D stationary deformational states). NO accelerations or masses.

Comments #1 on The Silver Surfer

July 4, 2007

Comments on The Silver Surfer and The Hypergeometrical UniverseAnonymous said... Say, there are two observers A and B separated by distance X. The observer A starts motion in direction of B with such an impulse, that by the time he reaches B, his velocity will match the Hubble velocity. What will the observer B see? Will the A continue his motion? Will he slow down and stop?---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------To answer this question the first thing to notice is that one can see A and B on both cross-sections shown above. We will use just the left panel RXYZ cross-section to answer this question.Let's first check the initial condition where the Fabric of Space is relaxed on both A and B positions, reminding that the Fabric of Space is the wave we ride - where the 3D space and all dilators (matter) are located.At first sight you might think that the objects on positions A and B are at rest with respect to one another. This would be the case if the 3D Hypersurface were not expanding at the speed of light. In reality they are traveling away from each other at their Hubble velocity. Be their distance X, then they are running away from each other by X/R*c This can be easily derived if one considers that the radial expansion takes place at the speed of light and the geometry of the figure.That is why one can only see thing up to one radian in each direction.The first thing to notice is that it is not clear how to measure the local deformation of the Fabric of Space. This topology (hyperspherical expanding 3D Universe) is connected to the 4D Big Bang proposed in the Cosmogenesis paper.Under that assumption (Big Bang = 4D explosion), the average velocity on any region of the 3D space is the Hubble velocity, that is, farther regions contains celestial objects that on average run away from us at the Hubble speed. What one can distinguish from one region to another is the width of that distribution. When most of the interactions had taken place a long time ago, the distribution will be sharper. A sharper distribution of receding velocites means that the objects are close to their Fabric of Space relaxed positions.The comment requires that object A, under the action of an impulse, to reach its Hubble velocity at position B. Velocity is a tilt in the local Fabric of Space and that tilt should make the local normal to be parallel to the Fabric of Space normal at position B. The diagram that would reflect that condition would be the following:For the distance between the objects to diminish, the tilt (velocity) has to be larger than the Hubble tilt (velocity) between the two objects, thus the proposed experiment doesn't make sense and that is the reason for the paradox.

Encounters of the 4th Kind....:)

July 1, 2007

Going NOWHERE Fast

June 19, 2007

Going NOWHERE Fast...:) Well, well....:) Now you can stretch your brain a little more and understand what Science is grasping at straws to explain... The Supersolidity Effect..Not unlike in the case of liquid helium 4 superfluidity, the thought constraints due to the Equivalence Principle between Gravitational and Inertial Masses created the conjecture of solid superfluidity..This is a much simpler problem if one understands quantum mechanics, motion (accordingly to my model) and simple topology.Supersolidity is the idea that a solid can freely pass through itself ??? whatever that means.The experiment that gave rise to such a contrived idea is the following:a) Pick up a bucket of solid helium 4b) Rotate it around its axis and cool it down further.c) At a given temperature, the bucket of Helium 4 suddenly starts rotating faster....:)The simple-minded explanation is that somehow the core of the solid helium rotating volume simply stopped rotating while the exterior crust started rotating faster to conserve angular momentum.This is an idea with very large holes..>:)a) First, for the middle core to stop rotating, it has to receive a torque..>:) supposelly the same torque that makes the exterior crust to rotate faster afterwards... THE OBVIOUS QUESTION IS WHY??????WHY WOULD SUCH TORQUE BE CREATED?I am not going to waste time thinking along those lines...Quantum Mechanics provides a much simpler although extremely surprising (for the people who doesn't know the Hypergeoemtrical Universe theory) answer.As the temperature goes down, the wavefunction defining each atom in the spinning bucket gets wider. This means that any observable quantity has to be the result of averaging this wavefunction with the observable operator. In the case of velocity, the operator is the inclination of the local space. I will not try to draw a Mexican Hat or a twisted Mexican Hat...:) it is too difficult...I can tell you in simple words... As the wavefunction gets wider, it starts probing positions on the other side of the center of rotation, that is, it probes motion with components both positve and negative. This averages the state of motion to a lower effective velocity. As the temperature goes down further the masses positioned close to the center of rotation changes their state of motion into no motion and that state doesn't change with an increase in angular velocity.This means at that lower temperature, the boson solid loses moment of inertia but doesn't lose gravitational mass. It also doesn't lose inertial mass for linear motion!!!!!This decouples Gravitational Mass from Inertial Mass and Linear Inertial Mass from Rotational Inertial Mass...:) QED.If you now ask me what would happen in a bosonic celestial body that is close to zero kelvin... I would say it would rotate at the speed of light...:) No ifs or buts...If you read my theory you will realize that there are other ways to reach things deemed impossible by our Science....:)Rebel against that... There is a lot to lose if one stops dreaming, but to dream that things are in a way they are not is not conducive to a great human adventure...Cheers,MP

The Silver Surfer and The Hypergeometrical Universe

June 19, 2007

The Silver Surfer and The Hypergeometrical UniverseI am back after a long hiatus due to life...:)

Some Hints on the Onionlike Flying Orchestra

May 26, 2007

Some Hints on the Onionlike Flying OrchestraThis Blog was written prior to my vacation and job change...:) I found it today when I started to prepare myself to write about the Hyperons...:)I actually did not have time to work on the Hyperon Family during the vacation but I hope to do so tomorrow - a rainy Saturday...:)The Onionlike description is accurate... I had to provide the model in stages.... It is more didactic.. Onionlike because there are different views of the same process which contains different level of detail... Not unlike thinking about Earth as a little Ball rotating around the Sun... On a closer look you can see that Earth rotates around its own axis... On a even closer look you start to see that there is a Moon and Earth and Moon circle around their center of mass....:)In the Hypergeometrical Standard Model... Electron and Proton are quite simple and fundamental... a 4 notes dimensional chord... Electron and Proton differs from each other on which note is played first...:)When one comes into a Neutron, I initially told you that it was a dimer... Later I disclosed the 8 notes chord associated with that particle... Later, I will tell you that the eight notes chord can also be described by two eight notes chords (the original dimer paradigm, just now told with dimensional chords)...:) In the case of some hyperons (composed of three 4 notes chords), the degeneracy is three-fold...:) or you start to have three twelve notes chords being played at the same time... I will later make some pictures for you to understand this better...:)In any event, you should be able to get the gist... Under a degenerate dimensional chord particles, one could have an orbital angular momentum (an extra quantum number)...Here is the Lost Blog... Enjoy---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life changes and remains the same...:) I am off to another vacation and will work on the Hyperon Family.I can advance a litte hint on a sutle aspect of the Flying Orchestra. As you might remember, the Universe is modeled as a lightspeed expanding hyperspherical 3D Universe embedded in a 4D Cartesian Continuous Spatial Framework. This expansion, shown in the above picture, is timed by an Cosmological Clock (Cosmological Time). Not unlike the expansion direction R, the Cosmological time cannot be observed (can be observed only if you look very far away in any direction - that boundary will be expanding at the speed of light and timed by this Cosmological Time). The only time that is observed in the XYZ-Tau spacetime framework is the proper time or the projection of the Cosmological Time onto one's referencial frame.Now let's talk about what really matters. Early in this series, I presented a representation of a Neutron as a Electron-Proton Dilator dimer. Later, I refined the model and introduced the Spinning Double Potential Well and the DIMENSIONAL CHORDS associated with Proton, Electron and Neutron.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------This is how far I got before getting to the vacation...:)I will try to clarify further tomorrow...:)Cheers,MP

The Universe Has To Wait

March 26, 2007

The Universe Has To Wait

Newton's First Law

March 26, 2007

Newton's First LawI mentioned that I was afraid that my legacy would be my Balls Diagram...:) but I am afraid I will have to challenge Newton's Laws also and them only my Intellectual Courage or Audacity will be remembered...:)First let's review Newton's Laws with the help of Wikipedia: The Three Laws of MotionNewton's Laws of Motion describe the acceleration of massive objects. The modern understanding of Newton's three laws of motion is:First LawIf no external force acts on a particle, then it is possible to select a set of reference frames observed from which the particle is seen to move without any change in its velocity. These reference frames are called inertial reference frames.

Time Quantization and the Fat Electron

March 15, 2007

Quantum Time and the Fat ElectronI thought it would be a good time to review the meaning of Time Quantization and its connection to the Fat Electron (Fundamental Dilator).This is a very deep Blog with profound implications. This is also a Blog about Science and I do Science for fun...:) thus expect an entertaining and educational voyage through the Fourth Dimension....:)Here I present a pseudo-Time Quantization Ansatz, which means that although time might not be quantized, the final effect for 3D interactions is not unlike Time Quantization...:)At the end of this Blog you will understand what is 4D-Mass, 3D-Mass and why Time can be Quantized and Continuous at the same time..>:) and of course, the most important:Why did I use a one atomic mass unit electron in my calculations!!!!Time Quantization Ansatz:Let's consider that you have a Girlfriend on a Swing - I had to get the Kid out of the Swing for this Gedanken Experiment. It will become clear soon why...:) (in my case, it would be a girlfriend, in your case it might be something else)...:)She asks for some untimely spanking and you have to comply. Well, that is where Time Quantization comes into play. What is the best way to comply?... Of course, it is when she is standing still, or at the pi multiples of the swing harmonic oscillation...:)Of course, if there were some Malabarism taking place as the Swing goes to and fro such that she becomes really skinny (flatten like a 2-D Girlfriend)...:) then there might be some more calculations to consider. Let's say that this Flattening occurs with half the frequency of the swing - spin half-, then she will become 3D and spankable only once every four pi multiples...:)How such paradigm would help us understand Pseudo-Time Quantization?Let's recapitulate a few things from the past and a few from the future:

The Importance of Physics

March 4, 2007

Hyperon's Final Chapter

February 21, 2007

Hyperon's Final Chapter

The Deltas and their Twisted Minds

February 21, 2007

Hyperon's Crazy Brothers

February 19, 2007

Hyperon's Crazy BrothersEvery family has a problem child, the Hyperons are not different...:) In fact, they are all dysfunctional, mass challenged, always ready to blow up into pieces...:) Very, very dramatic bunch of highly excited particles...:)I will be dissing the Hyperon Family for a while so I will use the gossip standard and will stay in this blog a little... If you read it once, read it again, I might have divulged more sordid details about the Family...:)Let's remember what the Singing Universe paradigm is. We represented the fundamental particles (proton and electron) as two phases of a dimensional volumetric displacement chord (like a musical chord, just instead of sound, you hear dimensional (metric) modulations).We introduced some of the members of the Hyperon Family (some of them might not be formally a member of the family, e.g. proton, electron). Consider the proton and electron as the stem cells that generated the whole family.All particles are just combinations of those chords. I should remind you the Balls Diagram and the Coherence Diagram for the Pion Minus:Below is the amazing Pion Minus complex chord which is actually composed of four fundamemtal chords or 16 notes. This complex coherence or chord can also be shown as: I am not a musician, but you can read the chords as an electron chord, followed by a electron-positron transmutation note (half-neutrino chord), followed by a positron-electron transmutation note (another half-neutrino), followed by another electron chord, followed by an electron-proton transmutation note and lastly and proton-electron transmutation note.The last note recovers the first state of the coherence and completes the Pion Minus Chord.As you can see, the Pion Minus ate two electrons and a positron and acquired even more mass than one would expect from that. He is really Mass Challenged...:)Let analyze how could the Pion Minus become soooooo Fat...:) while eating just two electrons and a positron...:) ... You know, each one of those are only 0.510998918 MeV/c^2 ...Eating like a bird, that is what he said, but that would only add to 3 x 0.51=1.53 MeV/c^2. The Pion Minus is actually 139.57018 MeV/c^2... He might binge while sleeping... that is the only explanation...:)There might be another one. When Pion Minus came to us (Jenny Craig), he was FAT and couldn't figure out why...:) The first thing to remember about Mass (3D Mass) is that: it is not what you eat that matters, it is how do you project what you eat in the 3D Hyperspherical Universe... simple as that..:) I am sure you all are thinking about how to loose those pesky extra pounds...:) Just hide them in the Hyperspace...:)To understand how that extra mass appeared, let's see the Coherence Diagram again (I might start calling this a Chord Diagram in the future). The first chord is an electron chord followed by an electron-positron transmutation chord, then a positron chord followed by a positron-electron chord, then a second electron chord followed by an electron-proton transmutation chord and a proton-electron transmutation chord.

Newton's Third Law

February 19, 2007

Newton's Third LawBy now, I am sure you people are upset that I have been picking on poor Newton. It just happens that his work is fundamental and revising it is a sign of respect and something I couldn't avoid.The last law states that the force sensed by two interacting bodies are equal and in opposing directions (signs).

Newton's Second Law

February 18, 2007

Newton's Second LawI had to reinterpret Newton's Second Law in the Hypergeometrical Universe to recover the Equations of Motion. This might hurt your Brain, but I promised it will be worthile...:)The first thing I have to point out is that Newton's Law and everything you know about the Universe lies on the right panel of the Hypergeometrical Universe Icon (above, staring you in the face...:) I also should remind you to read the Blog - The Force be with you, Not...:) There, I mentioned that the correct paradigm doesn't have force, mass, charge.The right panel contains only an unobservable absolute time, x and t ' and x' (I didn't draw the x' to avoid confusion and to emphasize that different inertial reference frames have different time projections t and t').In my paper, I expressed Newton's equation as:

Of Mice and Men...

February 14, 2007

Of Mice and MenYou have been reading about my audacity - The Balls Diagram..:), intellectual courage and other bravados... It might be time for me to be real....:)I work very hard, learned a lot in life, have strong ideals and am extremely driven... Like to try to fool myself in thinking I am made of stainless steel...:)I know that that is not the case, but it helps in trying to get things done...As you know, I wrote a lot here and there and everywhere about this theory. I've just had to do it, since I couldn't find any resistence to it, nobody ever said anything I couldn't answer and the theory has the most aesthetic beauty and simplicity. When you see the Universe in such a different way, if you really are a true Mankind cardmember carrying, you would like to make this idea part of the collective knowledge soup.... The stuff we use to make the future ... to reach the Undiscovered Continent... This is not to say that I am messianic and am here to deliver the truth...(like Steve Colbert)...:) but this is to say I would like to voice the idea ... gingerly if necessary... but express it ..In the past, at the beginning of this blog, I tried to contact the leaders in this field. Gingerly sent them one email asking for any comments. Never received any acknowledgement and cowardly let things stay that way...After getting the idea published in the Quantization in Astrophysics book, I though that maybe it is time to try to engage someone and maybe get a comment or two... or in the best of the Universe, have an actual vigorous scientific debate...:)Enboldened by the publication, I made another gingerly effort and send this email to Dr Kay, an Astrophysics professor from Columbia University.From: MPSent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 3:47 PMTo: 'lkay@barnard.edu'Subject: Hypergeometrical UniverseDear Dr.Kay,I created a new theory - The Hypergeometrical Universe, which describes interactions (forces) and particles in purely geometrical terms. It also provides a simple and unified approach to all the forces.I would like to give a talk on the subject such as to obtain some feedback.The work has been published in a collaborative book on Quantization in Astrophysics.http://hypergeo.s3.amazonaws.com/static/media/uploads/blog/QuantizationDiscretization.pdfCurrently, I am bloging the Hypergeometrical Standard Model where I describe the Hyperons in terms of dilators (metric modulators) and their respective dilaton (traveling metric modulations) chords. The blog site is given by:http://hypergeometricaluniverse.com/I am not in academia anymore so it would be quite stimulating to hear someone's else opinion.Regards,MP

Newton's First Law...

February 11, 2007

The Balls Diagram

February 9, 2007

The Balls DiagramAs you know, didactics requires some memorable associations and I thougtht about this one while listenig to Chris Matthews' Hardball. Valentine's Day was also in my mind...:)So let's learn some physics up, Fellas.:)The Balls Diagram has been shown for the initial particles of the Hyperon Family and even though they should be self-evident, I thought that it would be worthwhile to spend a blog on it...:)Let's take the Coherence Diagram for the Pion Minus for simplicity and its corresponding Balls Diagram.Pion Minus

The Capital Sins

February 9, 2007

The Capital SinsThere are a few Sins that are relevant to Science. The one that I believe is most damaging is Vanity. It demonstrates itself in two forms: People will say that something they couldn't understand is extremely difficult - by definition - and the other is that they will pursue their extremely complex model as opposed to try to understand someone's else simpler paradigm...:)I created a simple explanation for the Universe. It has been said that it could never be done... It has been said that it might be explainable only by a theory from the 23rd Century..:) People told us that for that they (Einstein) would have to read God's mind....etcWhat if the Universe is just a Flying Orchestra where each member plays a simple tune and they always play in tune with the surrounding music (Quantum Lagrangian Principle)...:) Would you give this theory a chance to be published or heard...:)Vanity has precluded that from happening and has precluded Mr./Mrs. Scientist (imitating a South Park's General) from giving me the time of the day...:) They have been too busy making their Rube Goldberg conjectures...:)

Pion Plus and The Philosopher's Stone

February 8, 2007

Pion Plus and The Transmutation of MatterSome time ago I mentioned that I would deliver a Pedra filosofal or the Philosopher's Stone, the Alchemist dream of transmutationBefore you start making your plans for a rich retirement in the Bahamas, you might as well relax with some Pion Plus Music...:) There will be plenty of transmutation there...:)Here are the decay equations associated with the Pion Brothers:Let's start with the Coherence Diagram containing the Dimensional Chords:One notices that the spectral content remains the same, that means that the decay products will differ only by phase. The front laden anti-proton to positron transmutation note generates the first positron of the sequence. Figure below shows this complex chord in a simpler manner:If one compares it with the Pion Minus presented before, it is clear that they differ just by a phase. In the Pion Minus the initial phase is a electron while in the Pion Plus is is a positron. The phase difference is just 180 degrees tunelling.Below is the Coherence Diagram for the Pion Zero:and its corresponding balls diagram...:) You might notice that the Pion Zero looks like two justaposed electron-positron pairs of notes. You might ask how those two notes pairs don't anihiliate or collapse? There is a simple answer, they are not in the same time, that is, they are sequential notes. The other half of the answer has to do with angular momentum, for anti notes to continuing existing or be something in life, they have to carry a total momentum different than zero. The idea is that if in the electron note one compresses 4D space and in the positron note one dilates the same space by the same amount, the net work is zero - work, energy and deformational or twisting are the same. This would mean that the note sequence could be eliminated or added without changing particle. Now if the zero note pair has angular momentum, then it cannot be eliminated willy-nilly.

The Singing Paradigm

February 8, 2007

The Singing ParadigmIt is NOT everyday you witness the birth of a new paradigm. Today is one of those days.I have been explaining the theory bit by bit... and cementing each new layer with the a new nuance of my vision of the Universe.The initial cinder blocks of this new paradigm were the proposed hyperspherical shock wave Universe topology. That was supported by Cosmological observations, like the equating of the Cosmic Microwave Background with a Doppler Shifted Big Bang Gamma Ray Burst.At that point, Life imitated Art and I realized that one can only reach the Alpha Quadrant (45 degrees of the Cosmological Angle in each direction) and that by traveling at the speed of light forever. One can see one radian or the Beginning of the Universe or thereabouts.Amusingly enough the Big Bang occurred in each and every point of this 3D Universe and that is a simple consequence of the topology....:) This means the the initial heat and energy that were bursting at the time of the Big Bang from the chair where you are sitting right now is reaching a position one radian from it (Cosmological Angle - see figure at the top of the blog) at this time while the energy that left that point is reaching you right now...:)In this topology you are always at the center of your Universe and that is valid for all and everybody...:) A nice trick just for the Egocentric people around..:)The second layer on this house was the Grand Unification of Gravitation and Electromagnetism and summary dismissal of the remaining obscure forces. In time, I will further clarify what I did with them, although that should be patently clear for a good reader...:)I did not dwell on minor points like Cosmogenesis, since it would clash with your preconceived ideas. The paper is on this site under Papers. I also did not dwell in less relevant aspects of Time and only told you about the existence of the Cosmological Time and the we observe only time projections. I mentioned the Gedanken Experiment of the Amoeba in an Ascending Bubble in the Bottom of the Sea..:) Someday, I will explain it better if you cannot understand it.The last but not the least was the changing in paradigm on matter. It was always used without a thorough description, but in the Hypergeometrical Standard Model I replaced all the Feynman diagrams, Puzzling Confined Quarks, Reciprocal Symmetries (Hamiltonian should be invariant to a substitution of r by 1/r for the Strong force to be unifiable with other forces) by a bunch of simple 4D Deformational Angular Momentum Laden "Musical" Notes.An chord of four notes represents both an electron or a proton depending upon which one I play first...>:) More complex chords (in multiples of four) make up for all the Hyperons - a very musical family...:)Now looking from outside of the Universe, it is clear that The Orchestra is Flying at the Speed of Light...:) since each element of the Orchestra (any particle) flies in the 3D Shock Wave Hyperspherical Universe.I know that immediately each and every crackpot will say... Aha... I knew that the Universe had a tune... I always hear it in the back of my mind...:)I guess I don't care... :) Crackpots will always be crackpots...I will tell now you about Pion Plus and the Transmutation Note...:)Cheers,MP

The Flying Orchestra

February 7, 2007

The Flying OrchestraLet's review what the Hypergeometrical Standard Model has done to the Universe. The Hypergeometrical Universe Topology places the whole 3D Universe flying at the speed of light as a 3D Hyperspherical Shell or Shock Wave Universe. There has always been some silly statements about the Universe having a tune (being in tune with the Universe)... :) or having a frequency or any other half-backed concept along those lines..By introducing the concept of dilator as coherences between deformations (modulations) of a 4D space metric, I was able to create the chords associated with difference particles. Simple reasoning about which rotation axis in the four-dimensional space was used to replace funky Quarks like the Strange etc... Delta particles are supposed to have strange quarks, I believe., and of course, they are easily represented by the Hypergeometrical Standard Model.I am able to explain them and everything (Theory of Everything) without any new construct!!!!!This is a clean model based upon simple concepts of spinning, 4D volumes and 3D projections of those volumes.By associating with each particle in the Universe a simple chord which gets repeated over and over again until the particle decays, I was able to associate a Musical Instrument to each particle in the Universe.Since they are traveling at the speed of light along the Radial coordinate, I can claim that:I've just thrown the Whole Orchestra along Their Beautiful Song at the Speed of Light....:)Not only that, I also told you what the song is about....:)Cheers,MP

Pion Minus

January 29, 2007

Pions and NeutrinosLet's start with the simple things first: electron Neutrinos...:)Their coherence map is given by the four notes. Any spin half particle has always a four notes chord. I don't know anything about music, but I will make the analogy between a 180 degrees tunelling to a musical note. Since 180 degrees tunelling corresponds to 90 degrees spinning and 360 degrees corresponds to four of those events, each particle corresponds to at least four notes. The coherence is between the two Electron states. They differ just by a rotation around x. Axis are given by (0,-2/3,-1/3) and (0,-1/3,-2/3). The boldening of the first axis lenght or quantum number means that spin happens in a direction perpendicular to the x-axis and the radial axis (the fourth dimension). This is important since one has to add up half-spin associated with each chord. The neutrino chord has spin half, similarly to the neutrino particle of the standard model.It is important to notice that the tunneling frequency between the two Electron states is different from the fundamental dilator frequency and thus the interaction among neutrinos and the rest of the Universe goes in and out of phase as the neutrinos travels, resulting in a vanishingly small interaction. This is why Neutrinos are low interacting particles. The other reason can be understood from the fact that the 4D particle is the rotation of a two dimensional ellipse (with non-zero y and z axes) around the axis perpendicular to the Radial direction and the x direction. This would result in zero 3D projection or zero 3D mass.The mass is also a function (3D Projection) of the total displacement volume of the dilator. The neutrino having the smallest axis lenghts and being part of the electron potential well, will also have the smallest 3D mass (3D projection of the 4D displacement volume).Notice that the transmultation notes in the Neutron Model have half-neutrino note in their composition (the note is composed of of the four coherence arrows).The neutrino model is necessary to be able to understand the pion model. The reason for that is because a pion minus will decay into an electron and a neutrino.

Electron-Proton Fundamental Dilator

January 28, 2007

This is Music to My Ears

January 24, 2007

This is Music to My Ears

Good News...:)

January 16, 2007

Hypergeometrical Universe

November 19, 2006

The Wisdom in a Grain of Sand

November 12, 2006

No News in The Front...

November 10, 2006

Number Two

November 9, 2006

Number One

November 9, 2006

Plans for the Weekend

November 9, 2006

Plans for the WeekendThe Monkeys will remain here until I receive a reply from Los Alamos ArXives or when I get tired of waiting..:) Whichever comes first...:)It has been almost one week and Los Alamos or the moderators of the Los Alamos ArXives did not send me a reply... I will keep you abreast of developments.

Good News.....:)

November 7, 2006

Updated Version of the Grand Unification Paper Out

November 2, 2006

Mass Challenged Electron

October 27, 2006

The Mass Challenged Electon...:)A friend of mine asked me to give a better explanation on the WHYs behind the Fat Electron...This is a revolutionary idea... In a single slight of hand, the Whole Universe became awfully homogeneous...:) and Simple....:)The first thing to remember is that waves are created by wavegenerating events (in that case they will dissipate) or are continuously created by wavegenerators....:)I try just to read Nature and Nature tells me that Gravitation and Electromagnetism do not vanish with time... thus matter has to be modeled as wavegenerators.Many crackpot theories in the internet miss that point, which I consider an important one... Without it one cannot create the concept of spatial deformation coherence... that is what is missing in all the crackpot theories that tried to compare themselves with mine...:)I am not saying that my theory is better or correct... It is just a theory... What I am saying is that mine is better thought through and based on sheer common sense ...:)Now that we know that there should be wavegenerators in the Universe and not just echoes of the Big Bang, one can consider what is a good model for a wavegenerator...Simple analogy - I say simple but I know that what I say is not simple for most people- with electronic coherences is used to create the wavegenerators.Most people slept through the class on the expected value of X in a coherence between two states of a double well potential... It doesn't seem important, just a footnote in a Quantum Mechanics class...:) I am an Electronic Engineer and always tried to make a physical model of whatever I learned. In this case, the expect value of a coherence between two states of a double potential well is an oscillating dipole, not unlike the ones I calculated in my Microwaves and Antennae Classes...:)This oscillating dipole analogy is a fully Quantum Mechanics result. It is not a Semi-Classical model... People who might come up with that perception simply didn't learn Quantum Mechanics properly.Now that we know that we are talking QM, the next step is to understand why to choose an Electron and a Proton as the counterparties of this Quantum Mechanical Dance...:)Well it is simple, although it took me six months to decide it. The first thing to notice is that the Fundamental Dilator is actually two particles or better can represent two particles. If one of them is unstable the whole coherence will be unstable.We know that Gravitation and Electromagnetism is not a transient interaction, thus one have to choose stable particles for the dilator... The Proton and Electron are stable particles which are present on all documented Gravitational and Electromagnetism data.Now, inspection of their masses and their dynamics modeling through the four-dimensional tumbling indicated the need for Pseudo-Time Quantization and recognition that the dynamics described is taking place in a 5D Spacetime....:)At that point, everything felt in place and the theory made sense.

Pitch Forks and The Scientific Inquisition..:)

October 27, 2006

Pitch Forks and The Scientific InquisitionPretty soon I will defend Science...:) My theory should be able to defend itself, but I will have to defend it from nonsensical questions or comments...Before I do it in terms of specific comments and questions, I should preemptively strike and demand an level playing field...:)I will write down a few things that my theory answers which were never asked to others...:)My theory is a fully geometrical Grand Unification Theory. General Relativity tried to be a geometrical theory as Aristoteles envisioned, but felt short from it. First it has non-geometrical constructs left and right (Energy, Mass, Momentum, Charge, etc)... The second failure is due to the fact that if the concept of geodesical trajectories is so good, why it didn't apply to Electrostatics (other than through the covariant electrodynamics). The field around a Proton is 10^36 times stronger that the Gravitational field around an equivalent mass. My estimate of 10^36 is the correct one, simple comparison between G and 1/(4.pi.epslon) would yield something around 10^41 or so... That means that one Proton is equivalent to 10^36/6.026E26 Kg... or 10^10 Kg or 10 Million Tons... In the Science at Einstein's time it would be proportional to 10^5 time larger than that or 10^12 tons.... This means that a charged one Farad Capacitor would be more than enough to create a Black Hole.. This means that the most beautiful contribution of GR (the geometrical interpretation of curved spacetimes) didn't receive the most basic scrutiny...:)Quantum Mechanics failed horrendously in two of their most famous paradox: the Double Slit Experiment and the Action-At-Distance Paradox... Both, I solved within this blog and papers... There is a criticism that was undully directed towards my theory, which is that a good theory should focus on explaining experimental data...:) That is laughable....:) Well, string theory cannot replicate any of the basic equations I replicated, that is, cannot explain basic Electrostatics, Magnetism or Gravitation... Many theories pay attention to Black Hole Entropy questions when the last time I checked there has been no entropic measurements on a Black Hole... Again, the devil is in the details... It is difficult to place a Black Hole into a calorimeter and measure the flow of energy and mass... and information...:)Not to mention, Black Holes have not been characterized enough even to show that they exist. The same can be said of Quarks... Today, I saw a new paper on the Los Alamos arquives where someone tries to explain Proton stability by adding another dimension to the problem... What happened with the simple explanation that the Proton is the lowest state of a system... Wouldn't that simple explanation be sufficient ... That is what I said here...:)I almost forgot, this theory explains why the speed of light is the limit... It is the only velocity. Nobody asked why when Restrict Relativity came out...:) In doing so, it also explains Unverse explansion (without resorting to Dark Energy).. inflation theory (infinite Universe expansion velocity)What is the meaning of Space being created...:) This is a basic question... I explain everything without having to create space all the time...:)Here are a few questions that my theory explains but no other does... I am sure nobody asked those questions before because they did not have an answer to them either...:)

Single Electron Double Slit Experiment

October 27, 2006

The Meaning of Planck's Constant

October 24, 2006

Double Slit Experiment Corrected..:)

October 19, 2006

Double Slit Experiment Corrected:Quantum Mechanics Revisited

First Milestone.....:)

October 14, 2006

Welcome to the Undiscovered Continent

October 12, 2006

Welcome to the Undiscovered Continent...:)A site dedicated to the New Physics of the Hypergeometrical Universe Theory.The Hypergeometrical Universe is a theory grounded on Physical Insight where the whole Universe is placed in motion at the Speed of Light. In doing so, all the forces of nature are unified in a simple framework.This site will be a polished version of my other site, The Hypergeometrical Universe and will contain the applications and the vision that will bring us to the Undiscovered Continent.Cheers,MP

Time Quantization and The Fat Electron

October 12, 2006

Quantum Time and the Fat ElectronThis is a very deep Blog with profound implications. This is also a Blog about Science and I do Science for fun...:) thus expect an entertaining and educational voyage through the Fourth Dimension....:)Here I present a pseudo-Time Quantization Ansatz, which means that although time might not be quantized, the final effect for 3D interactions is not unlike Time Quantization...:)At the end of this Blog you will understand what is 4D-Mass, 3D-Mass and why Time can be Quantized and Continuous at the same time..>:) and of course, the most important:Why did I use a one atomic mass unit electron in my calculations!!!!Time Quantization Ansatz:Let's consider that you have a Girlfriend on a Swing - I had to get the Kid out of the Swing for this Gedanken Experiment. It will become clear soon why...:) (in my case, it would be a girlfriend, in your case it might be something else)...:)She asks for some untimely spanking and you have to comply. Well, that is where Time Quantization comes into play. What is the best way to comply?... Of course, it is when she is standing still, or at the pi multiples of the swing harmonic oscillation...:)Of course, if there were some Malabarism taking place as the Swing goes to and fro such that she becomes really skinny (flatten like a 2-D Girlfriend)...:) then there might be some more calculations to consider. Let's say that this Flattening occurs with half the frequency of the swing - spin half-, then she will become 3D and spankable only once every four pi multiples...:)How such paradigm would help us understand Pseudo-Time Quantization?Let's recapitulate a few things from the past and a few from the future:

As Good as It Gets...:)

October 9, 2006

As Good as It Gets...:)This friend of mine told me that my Blog on Time Quantization and the Fat Electron was the funniest scientific papers he'd ever read...:) and told me that now the expectations are higher... and I am bound to disappoint everyone...I do believe it will always be the most important paper in this series. First, the Fat Electron is explained for the first time. When I wrote the original paper, I wrote it for the largest Eggheads in the planet and thought that they would immediately understand...:) I confess it was poorly explained ... It was done without time quantization...... but it wasn't as ground shaking as proposing the pseudo quantization of Time...:)The Fat Electron was also ground breaking...:) The idea that most of the Universe is composed of a single particle is quite remarkable ...:) This insight goes side by side with the Cosmological Coherence insight...:)

Photon Disentanglement...:)

October 9, 2006

Action at Distance:Quantum Mechanics Disentangled ..:)

Hypergeometrical Universe - Course Description

October 8, 2006

Hypergeometrical UniverseCourse DescriptionWe will start the course by describing its goals:

Infinitas Complicata

October 8, 2006

De Docta Ignorantia

October 8, 2006

Size Doesn't Matter...:)

October 8, 2006

Blog Index October

October 7, 2006

Blog IndexJune,2006 ArchiveHyperGeometrical UniverseJuly,2006Gravitation 101-THE HOLY GRAIL OF PHYSICSMay The Force be With You, NotHope Springs EternalWhy do things move?SuperstringsHow Science is Done These DaysThe Cosmic Microwave BackgroundUniverse as a Higher Dimension Shock WaveHypergeometrical CosmologyHyperGeometrical Universe TopologyAugust,2006E PUR SI MUOVE...:)Need your HelpDark Matter ....Schmatter...:)Why is the Speed of Light the Speed Limit?Fields of Dreams...Hyperspherical Universe????The Solution to the Olbers' ParadoxThe Meaning of Material ExistenceSeptember, 2006Peer Review..:)God's Amazing Parlor Magic Trick...:) (Solution to Action-at-Distance Paradox)October, 2006Hypergeometrical Shock Wave Universe SurfingGiordano BrunoTime Quantization and the Fat ElectronSize Doesn't Matter...:)Hund's Law and SupercondutivityDe Docta IgnorantiaInfinitas ComplicataHypergeometrical Universe - Course Description

Hypergeometrical Shock Wave Universe Surfing

October 4, 2006

Hypergeometrical Shock Wave Universe SurfingThanks for your support and attention... I really appreciate your reading of my theory.Presenting a new idea is a diffusion process...:) Ideas, revolutionary ideas are first disregarded as nonsensical (sometimes even called Quaint..>:) ), then fought and finally embraced...I believe my theory is almost passed the Quaint stage... Pretty soon the struggle for the Truth will start until we finally reach acceptance..:) Just prior to the next revolution...:)That is how it is and how it is suppose to be.There has been a shift in the air and in the statistics:The number of new hits (these plot only counts new readers) had a few noticeable peaks... The one on September 22nd is due to my proposed solution to the Action at Distance Paradox. On October 2nd I proposed the Quantization of Time (Pseudo- Quantization) supported by the Fat Electron, thus Spanking Physics...:) (just kidding...)The early stages of this theory were about diffusion. A few random (but well appreciated) readers would stumble into the site and discover but most likely not understand the theory... In the best scenario, they would give me a vote of confidence after seeing my Fat Electron usage. I used a 0ne atomic mass unit electron in my Electrostatic and Magnetism Calculations.Now it seems that the initial randomness has been substituted by a vigorous enlightment process...:) Please bring this site to the attention to the people who can best fight it... :) and the people who will become my collaborators...:)Bring me to your leader...:) (I always wanted to say that...:)When I created that paper, I had a different and less transparent argument to support the Fat Electron. I did not work or see the paper for one year until this date a few weeks ago when I had to remember my obscure reasoning. In recreating the argument I unveil the nagging perspective that I might have to quantize time to make sense of it in this new argument. Eventually everything turned out fine.. Like Marguerite rescuing Faust in the Last Act...:)As you can imagine, Faust is my preferred Opera...:)It seems that this two punch approach is working and is opening the doors to new readers, hopefully the people who disregarded the theory as nonsensical, and the ones who will now fight it tooth and nail..>:)Nobody used any "Sheer Common Sense" in Physics for the longest time... Even I, I confess...not too long ago, was also naive... In fact, I was naive until I came up with something different...That freedom allowed to review the premises in prior and competing theories with disastrous results (for them)...:)Well... It is late ... In my next blog De Docta Ignorantia, I will explain my opinion on Macroscopic Quantum Mechanics, The Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, EPR Paradox, and the Schrodinger's Cat.

Giordano Bruno

October 3, 2006

Giordano BrunoEvery time someone goes on a limb and proposes something that is different from the common refrain people is chanting, there is a need for a supporter.Giordano Bruno as described at Answers.com Italian philosopher who used Copernican principles in formulating his cosmic theory of an infinite universe. Condemned by the Inquisition for heresy, immoral conduct, and blasphemy, he was burned at the stake.

Peer Review..:)

September 30, 2006

Peer ReviewSometime ago I received an email inviting me to join a group Physics, Astronomy, Math, & Philosophy Forums just after I seeing a posting on about Moving Dimensions on one of those scientific list servers . This happened more than a year after I made my work public.

God's Amazing Parlor Magic Trick...:)

September 21, 2006

Action at Distance:Quantum Mechanics Disentangled ..:)If my theory were aimed at reading God's mind, I would also try to find out what is in God's Sleeves...:) As you might know by now, I don't consider reading God's mind to foster Wisdom a good idea . My theory has been based on what was useful and profound in about all the contributions the great minds of Science... I paid close attention to what they implicitly assumed in their theories, many times without realizing.....:)Let's wrap up the Action at Distance Puzzle. This has been the source of many outrageously speculative explanations, including infinite speed of information transfer, backwards time traveling, etc. It also spanned a new field, Quantum Encryption. Please read the blog and let me know what you think.The Paradox derives from a polarization experiment: A excited molecule decays and emits two photons w1 and w2 with correlated polarizations and a tightly defined k-vectors. The k-vectors are defined by the setup of the experiment itself and linear momentum conservation.The polarizations of the two outgoing photons are connected through the molecular frame of reference angle between transition dipole moments. The experiment probe how information about what happens in one arm is reaching the other arm by what seems to be Magic and/or hyperluminal speed communication and/or time travel.Experimental Details: On each of two arms, far from this light source, there are two polarizers and two detectors. The distance makes a strong selection on the k-vector cone. The fact that a detector have to absorb the incoming photon with high quantum yield, makes the detector itself a source of "vacuum noise" at the emission wavelenghts.The puzzle is that according to Quantum Mechanics, the outgoing photons don't have a defined polarization until they meet the polarizers. This is certainly true from experiments slicing a light beam, such that subsequent polarizers have 45 degrees angle with the prior ones.Since the two polarizers are far away from each other and the polarizers are placed at equal distance from the light source, a paradox is created: How is it possible for the information about the polarization of photon1 to reach photon2 in time for redefining its polarization? Remember that one is considering that the photons have ill defined polarization until they reach the polarizers.Using a correlated photon counter and changing one polarizer orientation, one can confirm that the two photons emitted at any given time, keep correlated polarization even thought there isn't enough time for any luminal/subluminal speed signal to reach the other photon.To solve this puzzle I had to resort to the basic understanding of light emission and absorption. The simple paradigm of a "Kid on a Swing" is the place to start. Bra's and Ket's are great for formalism but they hide the Physics, which always goes back to the "Kid on a Swing". This is my preferred analogy for emission/absorption. Scientist oftentimes forget or never learn that for emission or absorption to occur, a dephasing process has to take place. This means that the swing has to be slightly out of phase from the "Excitation" for energy transfer to occur. If you push the swing in perfect synchrony there will be no energy transfer.Our traveling photons might not know what they will have to become to pass that polarizer and hit the detector, but the emiting atom has perfect line of sight to the detectors through the polarizers. Let's make a Gedanken Experiment. Imagine that the excited state molecule has two eyeballs. Since there is a polarizer between the excited molecule and the detector, the "vacuum" field along that very small spherical angle (k-vector cone) will be dominated by the polarized emission of the detector surface. Notice that I placed "vacuum" in parenthesis since there is something to learn about it from this experiment. I will come back to this point at the end of this blog. Since the excited state molecule will be dephased by radiation coming from the detector, the outgoing photon will have a pretty well defined polarization. This is the same problem one have in a laser. The excited state medium knows what is the polarization permitted within the lasing cavity. There is a degree of intensity on the "vacuum field". Within a laser cavity, the vacuum is not thought to be a vacuum but to the be the field within a Hi-Q resonant cavity. If one considers the high selectivity of the experiment performed, the result will be the same. The two polarizers and detectors act as a Hi-Q laser cavity. The distance between the two arms select the k-vector of the "vacuum". This experiment is done under low excitation since one wants to measure correlation between pairs of photons. A larger number of photons arriving at the same time would be just equally distributed among the two detectors of each arm. This means that the detector itself (plus polarizer) and the geometry of the apparatus defines the polarization of the emission and thus eliminating any source of paradox. This means that the pre-selection of photon polarization occurs at the time of the emission. By the time the photon arrived at the polarizer its polarization was already compliant with a given polarization. As we know, if we send linearly polarized light along a properly aligned polarizer 100% of the light will pass through. This means that polarization is preserved and only changes if the polarizers are not aligned with the incoming beam.This is an effect of the observer on what is being observed prior/during to the "observed event - photon emission". Eveything else is history by the time the photon departs from the source.This is an example of estimulated deexcitation, in a regime of low photonic density. The noise with with the coherence couples doesn't come from some "vacuum" but directly from the detector itself.My reference to vacuum states is that all emissions are stimulated deexcitation, but the source is not a function of space, as in field theory but a function of the surroundings.This also means that zero point vacuum states for photons may not be a property of space.This would explain why any calculation of the zero point vacuum energy for the whole Universe blows up by a factor of 10^56 or thereabouts... Field theory is being developed considering vacuum a property of space... The huge factor should be taken as a hint...:)

E PUR SI MUOVE...:)

August 31, 2006

E PUR SI MUOVE...:)I wounder what would have happen to Galileo Galilei paper "Motion of Earth Around The Sun". Would it receive the same typical reply..>:)"This is too speculative..."This is the symptomatic of the replies I received from the Editor of Physical Review C and from moderated scientific lists. Somehow this first stage "Peer Review" pays very little attention to the arguments presented in my work, demonstrating the erosion of Editors/Moderators attention span...:)With respect to the word speculative, a full theory (Quantum Chromodynamics), particle accelerators and inumerous scientific careers were created based on a theory that is based on the existence of Quarks. Needless to say, there are no experimental proof of their existence but it seems that there is a tremendous resistence for anything that might challenge that view.Are Black Holes speculative? In fact, they are. They are being contested observationally even as we speak. There have been an observation that would indicate that when matter aggreagates in what would expect to generate a Black Hole, you end up with a hot plasma.Don't even get me started on Tachyons, Creating New Universes from Higgs Bosons etc... This field is littered with speculation!Please, feel free read the reply I received to my attempt to post a note about the theory in the sci.physics.research List and my reply to it, below... :)==============================================================================================================================================================================On 8/30/06, Igor Khavkine wrote:Unfortunately, the article you posted to sci.physics.research is inappropriate for the newsgroup because it is overly speculative.For more information, see the sci.physics.research charter at http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/spr.htmlPlease note that, since the article was posted to a moderated group and was not approved, it will not appear in ANY newsgroup. If you want to post it to any unmoderated newsgroup, you must post it again, avoiding any moderated newsgroups.Keep in mind that posts are randomly distributed to one of the ACTIVE co-moderators. At any given time, one or more of these can be inactive. If, rather than resubmitting a post in the normal way, you email a moderator directly, it might arrive while he is inactive, causing an unnecessary delay.Sincerely,Igor Khavkine,sci.physics.research co-moderator==============================================================================================================================================================================Below is my initial postingOn Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 11:52:21PM +0000, ny2292000 wrote:The Hypergeometrical Universe Theory might seem like a non-serious theory since it proposes a non-orthodox solution to the paradoxes of Cosmology (non-constantness of the Hubble constant, the homogeneity of the Cosmic Microwave Background etc)... but Nature is oftentimes non-orthodox...:)My theory proposes the the Universe rides and is the 4-Dimensional Hyperspherical Shock-Wave resulting from the decay of the initial Super-Symmetrical 4-Dimensional Spatial Deformation Event. Super-Symmetrical is mean here in the sense that the physical dimensions of this deformational state were above the supersymmetry conditions. The supersymmetry conditions in my theory refers to the maximum dimension where spin-zero and non-zero spin particles behave equally to the intervening spacetime waves. Matter is modeled as coherences between states in a 4-Dimensional Rotating Double Potential Well. The coherence time is matched to the lifetime of a particle while the spin is matches to the actual tumbling of that particle as it travels outwards in the proposed four-dimensional hyperspherical shock-wave expansion.There is no need for Dark Energy to explain the expansion state of the Universe. It is just an immediate result of the geometry.With the addition of the Radial fourth-dimension, it is easy to realize that motion is always at the speed of light and that the motion we are so concerned (along the 3-D manifold) is just a change of direction of the primary trajectory. This explains clearly why the speed of light is the fastest speed in the 3-D Universe. It would correspond to the particle to ride a perpendicular wave resulting in an interference pattern traveling at 45 degrees.From the spacetime waves generated from the coherences (particles or dilators), I was able to replicate Gravitation and Electromagnetism through the creation of a new Physics, that is, a physics that is based on a new Lagrangian Principle. This principle states that the dilators travel always in phase with the surrounding spacetime waveforms. This simple principle is easy to use. Just calculate the total waveform in the particle position and find its nearest next positive interference.Gravitation and Electromagnetism differs not by the Nature of the force but by the Nature of the Force Response. Gravitation affects zero spin particles (e.g. Hydrogen atom) while electromagnetism affects non-zero spin particles (e.g. Proton and Electron).The difference is that zero spin particle do not spin (tumble) as they travel outwards in the hyperspherical expansion. This means that they couple to hypersuperficial waves (3-D hypersurface) and that their k-vector only changes direction at the level as the k-vector of the Hypersurface changes from position to position. Remember that this is a 15 Billion Light Years "Hypersphere", so a change in position will ellicit only a very small change in the direction of propagation, thus the resulting acceleration would be very small, thus the small strength of Gravitation.Non-Zero Spin particle spin (tumble) and that couples allows them to couple to hypervolumetric wave modes. This also means that from expansion step to expansion step, they change their k-vector freely and thus the change is much larger than the change in the previously described situation. That is why for the same field, there are different results.This is a real unification.The part associated with Gravitation is described at Gravitation 101 in my blog.Full details on the derivation are presented in the papers on the site.Have fun and feel free to ask questions...:)http://hypergeometricaluniverse.com/blog/gravitation-101==============================================================================================================================================================================Here is my reply to the Dr. Khavkine's review.What is overly speculative about this posting, Dr. Khavkine?The papers contained in the site http://hypergeometricaluniverse.com/) show all the calculations associated with the proposed Grand Unification.The idea of traveling at the speed of light perpendicular to the 3-D space cannot be disproved due to the impossibility of detection of inertial motion. The proposed thin thickness of this shock wave universe along the radial coordinate does not allow allow detection any more than the uncertainty principle allows you to see the past...The theory is Relativistic since it keeps the Lorentz transform (rotation by an imaginary angle arctanh(v/c)) and quantum mechanics in the Bohr sense.In addition, the Grand Unification paper recovers Newtons'Gravitation Law, Gauss Electrostatic Law and Biot-Savart Law, thus Grand Unifying Electromagnetism and Gravitation.The hyperspherical expanding Universe allows for a different interpretation of the E=mc^2 energy as kinetic, thus excluding any other potential interpretation for it (Gluonic Potential).Particles are modeled in analogy to electromagnetic waves as being created by coherences between states. As you know energy is only transfered by a coherence between two electronic states when the coherence dephases. The same is proposed to be through with respect to the generation of spacetime waves. Only when the Coherence between two 4-D space deformation states is dephased one has a transition (particle decay).The proposed traveling at the speed of light paradigm should be obvious once presented. If one is going to follow a Pythagorean approach to describing Nature, all the elements of Nature should be described as deformation of space, coherences between deformations, and spacetime waves. Since these deformations have no spatial constraints, they should travel at the natural speed of propagation, which in this case is the speed of light.This explains in a simple manner why the speed of light is the liminting speed along the 3-D Universe.I will stop here since a full defense of all points of my theory would be very long.I would appreciate if you were to provide me with a substantive reason for the preclusion of my work. I am extremely interested in a real and substantive review of it and not a simple off the bat dismissal.The kind of of the disregard for new and well substantiated ideas has no place in Science. My theory has a strong revisionist nature and is supposed to be controversial, but it is not supposed to be censured just for being controversial.We are all scientists who love Science and new ideas and new ideas should be given a fair chance.Please feel free to ask me any questions.Marco Pereira

Need your Help

August 25, 2006

Just a few more Blogs to GoAlthough it is always a pleasure to help you see the Universe through a new lens, the original goal of this blog was to create an interface with the Cognoscenti of this area. Somehow, my outlandish theory did not create any of the heated debate I hoped for.As you know by now, this theory Drops Strong and Weak forces Like it is Hot :). This would not sit well with anyone who works on anything related to the standard current scientific view.The theory goes deeper. In creating a new Lagrangian Principle, the one that states that dilators are always in phase with surrounding spacetime waveforms (or should I say wavefields), I revised the basis for Dynamics, Gravitation and Electromagnetism. The revision is subtle, but extremely relevant. Obtaining a metric of this space is trivial... It correspond to three rotations:

Dark Matter ....Schmatter...:)

August 22, 2006

Why is the Speed of Light the Speed Limit?

August 17, 2006

Fields of Dreams...

August 14, 2006

Hyperspherical Universe????

August 3, 2006

The Solution to the Olbers' Paradox

August 2, 2006

Olber's Paradox and the Hypergeometrical Universe

The Meaning of Material Existence

August 1, 2006

The Meaning of Material ExistenceI believe that the simplest picture for matter is one of a four-dimensional “rotating double well”… Again, I am driven by physical considerations…The Nitrogen atom in the Maser have existence in one side of the hydrogen plane and disappears from existence in that side of the hydrogen plane with an oscillating frequency equal to the difference in energy between these two states divided by h (Planck constant). This is a coherence, that is, the real state is a linear combination of two states of different energies (frequencies). The difference in energy is what creates the beating.Figure 1. This figure shows a double potential well representing the energy levels of an out-of-plane vibration of Nitrogen in Ammonia. The space dimension is the distance from the Hydrogen Plane. This Figure was borrowed from the internet and its availability is greatly acknowledged and thanked for.In the case of Ammonia, the finite potential barrier in the middle allows for tunneling and that in itself results in a splitting of equal energy levels located on both potential wells. The difference in energy between these new hybrid levels will define the frequency of beating. In the case of Ammonia, the potential wells are symmetric and the beating frequency is in the microwave region. The probability of the Nitrogen being found in one side of the Hydrogen plane is equal to the probability of the Nitrogen to be found in the other side of the plane.In the case of an “Existing Particle” – material existence of a particle will be explored later in this work – it can be thought as a coherence between a massive and a massless states of the multidimensional space. The massless state lies outside the 3-D space along the radial direction. Their nature is of an eigenstate of spatial deformation (4-D space) potential rotating double well.The mass of different particles /state of space deformation is defined by the different probabilities of being found in the massive side of the potential well. That explains the large variety of particle masses.ParticleMass is a 3-D footprint (in the 3-D Universe we know) while they walk and tumble along the radial direction.This in a nutshell is the reason why different particles have different rest masses.You have to remember that in the theory particles always rotate (tumble) around the direction perpendicular to the plane XR (YR, ZR)..Those tumblings correspond to the Pauli spin (sigmax, sigmay, sigmaz)…Other quantum numbers can be obtained using similar reasoning…The meaning of Material Existence implies that as the molecule tumbles it should set foot on the 3-D space at multiples of the de Broglie wavelength… At this time, I am not explaining some other details of the meaning of Mass… It is an elaborate argument…I will explain later..Basically, to exist is to set foot on the Hyperspherical Universe Shock Wave every so often… If the phase is not correct, things don’t exist… To exist is to be phase-matched with the Hyperspherical Shock-Wave Universe.That is also the basic condition for Nuclear Chemistry.The potential well is not symmetric (the radial direction and the 3-D shell are not symmetric)… thus the occupation number on each side of the well are not equal….That is the reason for the different masses associated with different particles… just an occupation number on a “rotating four-dimensional asymmetric “double” well” … I say “double” because one of the sides is triply degenerated (3-D side or Universe side)…A simple problem…PS- The maximum potential mass of a particle is proportional to the absolute value of its charge...:) Hadrons have three dimensional footprints in the 3-D Universe we know.. Mesons have two dimensional footprints...

Gravitation 101

July 22, 2006

Gravitation 101 and the Holy Grail of PhysicsFirst things first... You have been a resilient reader and have been seen the trademark HyperGeometrical Universe Expanding Hyperspherical picture above time after time... It is about time for me to explain the exact meaning of each line.The first thing you notice is a green circle - this is the cross-section of what we know as our 3-D Universe. X is any direction. Notice that the model defines that the radius of curvature is equal to the dimensional age of the Universe (c - lightspeed times the age of the Universe - circa 15 billion years). Also notice that even though the curvature is defined by the motion along the fourth-coordinate, this is not the curvature that is referred to in General Relativity. That curvature is measure between the 3-D Universe and time (or spacetime). That curvature is influence by velocity and mass here and in the General Relativity.The curvature in the figure relates to the Hubble expansion process. Simple geometric considerations indicate that the average receding speed between two points of the Universe is c*Fi , where Fi is the Cosmological Angle. For a π radian angle (opposing points in the shock wave Universe) would result in a receding velocity of π*c. Notice that Universe expansion in this model does not requires any Dark Energy or Antigravitational Force although we do have Antigravitation in it. Antigravity will be covered in the HyperGeometrical Universe Standard Model.The receding speed for two points separated by one radian is c, that is, at one radian the average Hubble speed will be c and any radiation from that region will appear in the microwave region due to Doppler effect. This means also that one can never reach any point after one radian from where you are, the further you travel, the further the one radian point recedes. One can never observe any event that is moving away from you faster than the speed of light, one cannot see any point further from you by one Cosmological Radian.The initial space fluctuation was a little Hypersphere prior to breaking apart into all the particles of the Universe. Due to symmetry (perfect Hypersphere), the initial decomposition occurred in all places of the Universe. This means that wherever you are is where the Big Bang occurred. It also means that if you look far away (with a telescope), you will see the beginning of times or thereabouts. I will digress about the meaning of time later. These inital fluctuations will be covered in the Hypergeometrical Universe Cosmogenesis.The second fine point in the figure above are the time projections:1. Radial Time (Absolute)2. Dimensional Time τ (Relative)3. Cosmological Absolute Time ΦFollow the Yellow Brick Road to learn about time projections and a simple way of thinking in five dimensions. You will also learn why τ is called Dimensional Time when it is clearly a direction in the Four-Dimensional space. If you didn't go to the Yellow Brick Road, I will like to tell you that along that direction lies actually two directions (one direction and one projection) because linear motion is equivalent to two rotations. One around the axis perpendiculat to XΦ and another around the axis perpendicular to XR. One angle is imaginary and the other is real, respectively.Now it starts to become clear that the motion of the particle is actually in a five dimensional space (four physical dimensions and a time) and at the speed of light, being the three dimension motion just a drift. If you need to review supporting arguments about the last statement click here.Rotations imaginary or otherwise will reproduce nice relationships between waves. The imaginary angle rotation will produce Relativity, since it is a Lorentz transform. Here the directions are proper time and X.The real angle rotation will reproduce a nice visual relationship between the wave decomposition components (τ Direction propagating wave and the X direction propagating wave).Now that you know what the figure means, you can see the Holy Grail of Physics (of course, if this is correct - you have my word on it... after all, I've never lied to you before ...:)I couldn't resist and reproduced the Grand Unification Equation below...The total waveform is given by:The Gradient of this waveform should be set to zero and the closest maxima to each particle found. Notice that there is a k-vector in the equation. The k-vector has to be modified for particles in motion (magnetism from DC currents and electromagnetism from AC-currents). The modification is the appropriate Lorentz transformation and it is how I derived the Biot-Savart equation. The derivation will be presented later.This equation shows a body with N dilators (X Particles) interacting with another with just one.Notice that the first has a cosine on the denominator while the other doesn't. The reason for that is the usage of a "Short Wavelength Approximation". The large mass wave contribution is thought to have a small wavelength, thus the cosine oscillation is extremely fast. This means that maxima due to that contribution are bound to be extremely closely together. The oscillatory cosine is approximated by a constant.Notice that there is a P factor that relates to the dimensionality of the decay. Notice that the "field" equations are two dimensional (cross-sections) and that the decay happens in terms of the increasing circular perimeter. The perimeter increases in terms of the number of spatial dimensions (3) plus spin*(fourth-dimension). For example, for a particle of spin half P would be 3.5. For a particle of spin zero (neutral matter) P would be 3.It is slight complicated to understand that a body (collection of dilators) is perfectly lined up with the space in which it is embedded.

May The Force be With You, Not

July 18, 2006

Hope Springs Eternal

July 17, 2006

Hope Springs EternalWhen I decided to blog this theory, I hoped that it would generate enough interest and bring more scrutiny to it. While creating it, I tried to get people to read it without success.I am not from this field and learned that outsiders are outcasts in any situation. This theory was created by an outsider and I believe that is why it is so different, creative and probably correct...:)Many people following the same idea, repeating the same Mantras, Higgs Bosons, Conjecture This etc... will never be able to think outside that vocabulary.It has been said, that the theory of everything would require a new vocabulary, meaning a new set of mathematical constructs, new theorems etc... It was never said, the theory of everything would require a fresh perspective...:) Before scalating complexities for complexity sake, one should see if one can find simplifying assumptions. I looked around and found a few. Well, let's not be too involved with one's own ideas and restate this as, there should be a place in the literature for ideas which are not the one's which are the mainstream, giving that they have a rational support. I believe my ideas fall into that category. "Can't we all get along???? (hypergeometricists, string theorists, conjecturists...:)

Why do things move?

July 16, 2006

Why do things move?Mostly likely you never asked yourself this question? In fact this is actually two questions:

Superstrings

July 15, 2006

How Science is Done These Days

July 15, 2006

The Cosmic Microwave Background

July 15, 2006

Hypergeometrical Cosmology

July 12, 2006

HyperGeometrical Universe

June 20, 2006

The HyperGeometrical UniverseI finally decided to blog my theory into existence...In this Blog, I will present the Theory of Everything which I aptly named The HyperGeometrical Universe.For a deeper analysis, please visit the yahoo group site with the papers and FAQs. Here I will just explore the more interesting aspects of the theory.The origin of the name is not the Hypergeometrical Function, but the fact that all elements of the Universe are described geometrically as solitonic states or deformation waves of a flexible five dimensional spacetime.The added dimension in this space is non-compact and this new simple topology explains everything better than present compact topologies.The theory is composed of four parts:a) Grand Unification Theoryb) Cosmologyc) Cosmogenesisd) HyperGeometrical Standard ModelHere I will present the first two parts and that will be enough to answer the following transcendental questions:Q1. How was the Universe created ? -This is answered by the Hypergeometrical Cosmogenesis Theory.Q2. What lies outside the Universe?Q3. What is the shape of the UniverseQ4. Why can’t one see the absolute past or the future?Q5. Where did the Big Bang occur?Q6. Why is the Universe so isotropic and homogeneous?This is a late line of questioning originated from the measurements of the cosmic microwave background. The cosmic microwave background is considered to be the result of Big Bang and it is puzzling isotropic and uniform.Q7. What is the origin of the Microwave Cosmic Background?Q8. Why isn’t the Universe more like the result of any other three dimensional explosion?Q9. Why is the Cosmological Constant so close to zero?Q10. Can we travel at speeds higher than the speed of light? Are there objects moving at those speeds in the Universe?I will also be happy to tell you What Time is and that Time is both ABSOLUTE AND RELATIVE.Time has always puzzled Mankind. Newton, Einstein and Mach (and others) have their interpretations of time.You will have to go through a Thought (Gedanken) Experiment of Being an Amoeba Stuck to the Surface of an Upwards Traveling Air Bubble (Traveling from the bottom of the sea to its surface) to understand it...:) ... You will also have to understand the concept of Proxy....The nuances will be a little toughter to understand but stick to it and it will be rewarding.________________________________________Now let's start....Development in this area are currently driven by two forces:a) group theoretical considerations andb) the attachment to the prior formalism (e.g. Maxwell Equations in Kaluza-Klein Theory,etc.), that is, one would like to recover asymptotically those equations from whatever Theory of Everything one can concoct.These two forces are really one. The group theoretical considerations are used to keep only topologies that are consistent with prior developments.In summary, we are attached to form as opposed to content.It turned out, that those are unnecessarily restrictive constraints. In my line of thought, I revised the whole formalism by keeping only the reasons behind it. This will become clearer in subsequent blogs.This theory is a simple theory of everything, simple enough to be the framework where one can describe all known (known to me) physical phenomena (nuclear scattering, electromagnetism, radioactivity, gravitation) and it is complete (account properly for all the energy bits that are contained in matter).From Wikipedia - The "Plato's Allegory of the Cave"I will start this Blog with the description of the situation as I see it. The best description is given by the Allegory of the Cave direct from Wikipedia, and reproduced below:Imagine prisoners who have been chained since childhood deep inside a cave. Not only are their limbs immobilized by the chains; their heads are chained as well so that their eyes are fixed on a wall.Behind the prisoners is an enormous fire, and between the fire and the prisoners is a raised walkway, along which shapes of various animals, plants, and other things are carried. The shapes cast shadows on the wall, which occupy the prisoners' attention. When one of the shape-carriers speaks, an echo against the wall causes the prisoners to believe that the words come from the shadows.The prisoners engage in what appears to us to be a game - naming the shapes as they come by. This, however, is the only reality that they know, even though they are seeing merely shadows of images. Suppose a prisoner is released and compelled to stand up and turn around. His eyes will be blinded by the firelight, and the shapes passing will appear less real than their shadows.Similarly, if he is dragged up out of the cave into the sunlight, his eyes will be so blinded that he will not be able to see anything.At first, he will be able to see darker shapes such as shadows and, only later, brighter and brighter objects.The last object he would be able to see is the sun, which, in time, he would learn to see as that object which provides the seasons and the courses of the year, presides over all things in the visible region, and is in some way the cause of all these things that he has seen (The Republic bk. VII, 516b-c; trans. Paul Shorey).This part of the allegory, incidentally, closely matches "Plato's metaphor of the sun" which occurs near the end of The Republic, Book VI.